The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Enterprise Zones

  • Leslie E. Papke
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2125

Abstract

Enterprise zones are geographically targeted economic development incentives used in the United States by individual states since the early 1980s and the federal government since 1993. Research on state zone programmes that accounts for the endogeneity of zone designation finds little improvement in the employment and incomes of zone residents, but some evidence that firms respond to tax incentives for capital. In contrast, the federal empowerment zone programme combines tax incentives with local initiatives and access to large federal grants. Recent research on round one of the federal programme finds mixed evidence on zone resident employment.

Keywords

Enterprise Zones Investment Subsidies Labour Subsidies Tax Competition Tax Credits Tax Incentives 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Bartik, T.J. 1991. Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boarnet, M.G., and W.T. Bogart. 1996. Enterprise zones and employment: Evidence from New Jersey. Journal of Urban Economics 40: 198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondonio, D., and J. Engberg. 2000. Enterprise zones and local employment: Evidence from the states’ programs. Regional Science and Urban Economics 30: 519–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brashares, E. 2000. Empowerment zone tax incentive use: What the 1996 data indicate. Statistics of Income Bulletin.Google Scholar
  5. Busso, M., and P. Kline. 2006. Do local economic development programs work? Evidence from the federal empowerment zone program. Mimeo: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  6. Engberg, J., and R. Greenbaum. 1999. State enterprise zones and local housing markets. Journal of Housing Research 10: 163–187.Google Scholar
  7. GAO (General Accounting Office). 1991. Businesses’ use of empowerment zone incentives. RCED-99–253. US Government Accounting Office: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  8. GAO. 2004. Community development: Federal revitalization programs are being implemented, but data on the use of tax programs are limited. RCED 04–306. Washington, DC: US Government Accounting Office.Google Scholar
  9. GAO. 2006. Empowerment zone and enterprise community program: Improvements occurred in communities but the effect of the program is unclear. RCED-06–727. Washington, DC: US Government Accounting Office.Google Scholar
  10. Gravelle, J.G. 1992. Enterprise zones: The design of tax incentives, CRS Report for Congress 92–476 S. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
  11. Hanson, A. 2007. Poverty reduction and local employment effects of geographically targeted tax incentives: An instrumental variables approach. Mimeo: Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  12. HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development). 1992. State enterprise zone update: Summaries of the state enterprise zone programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  13. Papke, L.E. 1993. What do we know about enterprise zones? In Tax policy and the economy, ed. J.M. Poterba, vol. 7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Papke, L.E. 1994. Tax policy and urban development: Evidence from the Indiana enterprise zone program. Journal of Public Economics 54: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Papke, L.E. 2001. The Indiana enterprise zone revisited: Effects on capital investment and land values. National Tax Association Proceedings of the Ninety-Third Annual Conference. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.Google Scholar
  16. Peters, A.H., and P.S. Fisher. 2002. State enterprise zone programs: Have they worked? Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie E. Papke
    • 1
  1. 1.