The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Globalization and the Welfare State

  • Heinrich W. Ursprung
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2099

Abstract

Most scholarly investigations do not support the often heard claim that globalization impairs the welfare state: observed cuts in welfare programmes appear to be mainly driven by domestic factors. The empirical evidence supporting the converse claim – that globalization gains are used to compensate the losers from global economic integration – is, however, also inconclusive. In order to disentangle the multifaceted and potentially inconsistent globalization effects on the plethora of welfare state activities, future research will have to adopt a more explicit micro-orientation, better econometric techniques, and an empirical research strategy that is more firmly based on political economic theories.

Keywords

Compensation effect of globalization Deindustrialization Diffusion processes Efficiency effect of globalization Globalization Globalization and the welfare state Labour market institutions Labour market risk Political economy Risk sharing Social insurance Trade openness Welfare state 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Avelino, G., D. Brown, and W. Hunter. 2005. The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980–1999. American Journal of Political Science 49: 625641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bretschger, L., and F. Hettich. 2002. Globalisation, capital mobility and tax competition: Theory and evidence for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy 18: 695–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dreher, A. 2006. The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy – an empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy 22: 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Garrett, G., and D. Mitchell. 2001. Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39: 145–177.Google Scholar
  5. Hays, J., D. Ehrlich, and C. Peinhardt. 2005. Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: An empirical test of the embedded liberalism thesis. International Organization 59: 473–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hicks, A., and C. Zorn. 2005. Economic globalization, the macro economy, and reversals of welfare: Expansion in affluent democracies, 1987–94. International Organization 59: 631–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Iversen, T., and T. Cusack. 2000. The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics 52: 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jahn, D. 2006. Globalization as ‘Galton’s Problem’: The missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development. International Organization 60: 401–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kittel, B., and H. Winner. 2005. How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization–welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research 44: 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Plümper, T., P. Manow, and V. Troeger. 2005. Pooled data analysis in the comparative political economy of the welfare state: A note on methodology and theory. European Journal of Political Research 44: 327–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Podesta, F. 2006. Comparing time series cross-section model specifications: The case of welfare state development. Quality & Quantity 40: 539–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rodrik, D. 1998. Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy 106: 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ruggie, J.G. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36: 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schulze, G., and H.W. Ursprung. 1999. Globalization of the economy and the nation state. World Economy 22: 295–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Swank, D. 2002. Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heinrich W. Ursprung
    • 1
  1. 1.