Abstract
This article discusses the measurement of nutritional status of populations and examines two classes of tools that policymakers in advanced economies can use to improve nutrition: targeted food and nutrition programmes, and regulation of the food industry. It presents an overview of the economic rationale for providing nutrition programmes (rather than cash assistance), as well as an analysis of some of the difficulties of providing aid in kind – one of the chief difficulties is low take-up of programme benefits by eligible citizens. The overview of regulations suggests that measures aimed at improving nutrition information may be especially attractive.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Bhattacharya, J., J. Currie, and S. Haider. 2004. Poverty, food insecurity, and nutritional outcomes in children and adults. Journal of Health Economics 23: 839–862.
Besley, T., and S. Coate. 1991. Public provision of private goods and the redistribution of income. American Economic Review 81: 979–984.
Besley, T., and S. Coate. 1995. The design of income maintenance programs. Review of Economic Studies 62: 187–221.
Blackorby, C., and D. Donaldson. 1988. Cash versus kind, self-selection and efficient transfers. American Economic Review 78: 691–700.
Bruce, N., and M. Waldman. 1991. Transfers in kind: Why they can be efficient and nonpaternalistic. American Economic Review 81: 1345–1351.
Currie, J. 2006a. The invisible safety net: Protecting poor children and families. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Currie, J. 2006b. The take-up of social benefits. In Poverty, the distribution of income, and public policy, ed. A. Auerbach, D. Card, and J. Quigley. New York: Russell Sage.
Currie, J., and E. Moretti. 2007. Biology as destiny? Short and long-run determinants of intergenerational transmission of birth weight. Journal of Labor Economics 25: 231–264.
Cutler, D., E. Glaeser, and J. Shapiro. 2003. Why have Americans become more obese? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3): 93–118.
Fogel, R. 1994. Economics growth, population theory, and physiology: The bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. American Economic Review 84: 369–395.
Guardian. 2006. Supermarkets feel junk food ad ban bite. The Guardian, November 27.
Institute of Medicine. 2006. Food marketing to children and youth: Threat or opportunity? ed. M. McGinnis, G. Jennifer, and K. Vivica. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Ippolito, P., and A. Mathios. 1990. Information, advertising and health choices. RAND Journal of Economics 21: 459–480.
Ippolito, P., and A. Mathios. 1995. Information and advertising: The case of fat consumption in the United States. American Economic Review 85: 91–95.
National Research Council. 2003. Estimating eligibility and participation in the WIC program. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Neuberger, Z., and R. Greenstein. 2003. What have we learned from FNS’ new research findings about overcertification in the school meals programs? Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Whitmore, D. 2002. What are food stamps worth? Working Paper No. 468. Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University.
World Health Organization. 2005. The challenge ofobesity in the WHO European Region. Fact sheet EURO/13/05. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Currie, J. (2018). Nutrition and Public Policy in Advanced Economies. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2058
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2058
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences