Skip to main content

International Trade and Heterogeneous Firms

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 67 Accesses

Abstract

Empirical studies of production units within sectors have reported a massive amount of heterogeneity in various performance measures (most notably, size and productivity). This heterogeneity, within sectors, matters for theoretical and empirical models of trade. Trade, or trade liberalization more generally, induces important reallocations between heterogeneous producers in a sector: the smallest, least productive producers are forced to exit, and market shares are further reallocated between less productive producers (who do not export) towards larger, more productive exporters. These reallocations generate a new channel for productivity and welfare gains from trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Acemoglu, D., P. Antras, and E. Helpman. 2007. Contracts and technology adoption. American Economic Review 97: 916–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antras, P., and E. Helpman. 2004. Global sourcing. Journal of Political Economy 112: 552–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson, A., and A. Burstein. 2006. Trade costs, pricing to market, and international relative prices. UCLA: Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.E., and F. Robert-Nicoud. 2006. Trade and growth with heterogenous firms. Working paper no 12326. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B.., and J.B. Jensen. 1999. Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics 47: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B.., J. Eaton, J.B. Jensen, and S. Kortum. 2003. Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review 93: 1268–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B.., J.B. Jensen, and P.K. Schott. 2005. Importers, exporters, and multinationals: A portrait of firms in the US that trade goods. Working paper no. 11404. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B.., J.B. Jensen, S. Redding, and P.K. Schott. 2006a. Firms in international trade. Working paper no. 13054. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B.., S. Redding, and P.K. Schott. 2006b. Multi product firms and trade liberalization. Working Paper No. 12782. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B.., J.B. Jensen, and P.K. Schott. 2006c. Trade costs, firms and productivity. Journal of Monetary Economics 53: 917–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A.B.., S. Redding, and P.K. Schott. 2007. Comparative advantage and heterogeneous firms. Review of Economic Studies 74: 31–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesebroeck Van, J. 2005. Exporting raises productivity in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. Journal of International Economics 67: 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broda, C., and D.E. Weinstein. 2006. Globalization and the gains from variety. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 541–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broda, C., J. Greenfield, and D. Weinstein. 2006. From groundnuts to globalization: A structural estimate of trade and growth. Working paper no. 12512. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustos, P. 2006. Rising wage inequality in the Argentinean manufacturing sector: The impact of trade and foreign investment on technology and skill upgrading. Mimeo: CREI, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, T. 2006. Distorted gravity: Heterogeneous firms, market structure and the geography of international trade. Mimeo: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerides, S.K., S. Lach, and J.R. Tybout. 1998. Is learning by exporting important? Micro dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 903–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. 2002. Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70: 1741–1779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. 2008. Technology in the global economy: A framework for quantitative analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., S. Kortum, and F. Kramarz. 2004. Dissecting trade: Firms, industries, and export destinations. American Economic Review 94: 150–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghironi, F., and M.J. Melitz. 2005. International trade and macroeconomic dynamics with heterogeneous firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 865–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., D. Greenaway, and R. Kneller. 2004. Does exporting increase productivity? A micro-econometric analysis of matched firms. Review of International Economics 12: 855–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. 2006. Trade, FDI, and the organization of firms. Journal of Economic Literature 44: 589–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., M.J. Melitz, and S.R. Yeaple. 2004. Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review 94: 300–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E., M.J. Melitz., and Y. Rubinstein. 2007. Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. Working paper no. 12927. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, T.J., and K.J. Ruhl. 2003. How important is the new goods margin in international trade? Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. 1979. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics 9: 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. 1980. Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review 70: 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loecker De, J. 2007. Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71: 1695–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melitz, M.J. and G.I.P. Ottaviano. 2005. Market size, trade, and productivity. Working paper no. 11393. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavcnik, N. 2002. Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants. Review of Economic Studies 69: 245–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topalova, P. 2004. Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Working paper no. 04/28, International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trefler, D., and A. Lileeva. 2007. Does improved market access raise plant-level productivity? Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybout, J.R. 2003. Plant- and firm-level evidence on ‘new trade theories’. In Handbook of international trade, ed. E.K. Choi and J. Harrigan. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoogen, E. 2007. Trade, quality upgrading and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector: Theory and evidence from an exchange-rate shock. Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple, S.R. 2005. Firm heterogeneity, international trade, and wages. Journal of International Economics 65: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Melitz, M.J. (2018). International Trade and Heterogeneous Firms. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2055

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics