Abstract
The introduction of the euro in 1999 is without any doubt one of the great achievements in the European integration process. In one bold stroke, national monetary sovereignty was abolished and transferred to a new European institution, the European Central Bank, that from then on became the guardian of the new currency.
Until the eruption of the sovereign debt crisis there was a general perception that the euro zone was a great success. In 2008 the European Commission issued a report (euro@10; European Commission. Europe@10. Successes and challenges after ten years of economic and monetary unions. Brussels, 2008) that was unqualified in its praise about the achievements of the euro zone. Then came the sovereign debt crisis that has led many observers to reevaluate European Monetary Union (EMU). This article discusses its successes and failures, analyzes the fragility of EMU, and identifies two sources of this fragility. Finally, it discusses governance issues and the nature of the political institutions that will be necessary to sustain the European Monetary Union.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Baldwin, R. 2006. The euro’s trade effects. In ECB working paper, no. 594. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.
Baldwin, R., and C. Wyplosz. 2006. The economics of European integration. 2nd ed. London: McGraw-Hill.
Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. 1996. Operationalizing the theory of optimum currency areas. CEPR discussion paper, no. 1484.
Berger, H. and Nitsch, V. 2008. Zooming out: The trade effect of the euro in historical perspective. Journal of International Money and Finance 27(8): 1244–1260.
Calvo, G. 1988. Servicing the public debt: The role of expectations. American Economic Review 78(4): 647–661.
De Grauwe, P. 1992. The economics of monetary integration. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Grauwe, P. 2011. The governance of a fragile eurozone. http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/ew/academic/intecon/Degrauwe/PDG-papers/Discussion_papers/ Governance-fragile-eurozone_s.pdf
De Grauwe, P. and Moesen, W. 2009. Gains for all: A proposal for a common Eurobond. Intereconomics 132–141.
Delpla, J. and von Weizsäcker, J. 2010. The blue bond proposal. Bruegel policy brief.
EC Commission (1977). Report of the study group on the role of public finance in European integration (MacDougall Report), Brussels.
EC Commission. 1990. One market, one money. European Economy 44.
Eichengreen, B. 1990. Is Europe an optimum currency area? CEPR discussion paper, no. 478.
Eichengreen, B., R. Hausmann, and U. Panizza. 2005. The pain of original sin. In Other people's money: Debt denomination and financial instability in emerging market economies, ed. B. Eichengreen and R. Hausmann. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
European Commission. 2008. Europe@10. Successes and challenges after ten years of economic and monetary unions. Brussels.
European Commission. 2010. A structured framework to prevent and correct macroeconomic imbalances: Operationalizing the alert mechanism. Brussels.
Gourinchas, P.-O., and H. Rey. 2007. From world banker to world venture capitalist: The US external adjustment and the exorbitant privilege. In G7 current account imbalances: Sustainability and adjustment, ed. R. Clarida. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gros, D. 2010. The seniority conundrum: Bail out countries but bail in private short-term creditors. CEPS Commentary 10.
Gros, D. and Mayer, T. 2010. Towards a European monetary fund. CEPS Policy Brief.http://www.ceps.eu/book/towards-european-monetary-fund.
Ishiyama, Y. 1975. The theory of optimum currency areas: a survey. IMF Staff Papers 22: 344–383.
Issing, O. 2009. Why a common eurozone bond isn’t such a good idea. Europe’s World 677–679.
Juncker, J.-C. and Tremonti, G. 2010. E-bonds would end the crisis. Financial Times 5.
Kopf, C. 2011. Restoring financial stability in the euro area. CEPS Policy Briefs 15.
Krugman, P. 1993. Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU. In Adjustment and growth in the European monetary union, ed. F. Torres and F. Giavazzi. London/Cambridge: CEPR/Cambridge University Press.
McKinnon, R. 1963. Optimum currency areas. American Economic Review 53: 717–725.
Mélitz, J., and S. Vori. 1993. National insurance against unevenly distributed shocks in a European Monetary Union. Recherches Economiques de Louvain 59: 1–2.
Mundell, R. 1961. A theory of optimal currency areas. American Economic Review 51.
Rose, A.K. 2000. One money, one market: Estimating the effect of common currencies on trade. Economic Policy 30: 9–45.
Sachs, J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. 1989. Federal fiscal policy and optimum currency areas. Harvard University Working Paper. Cambridge, MA.
Verhofstadt, G. 2009. De Weg uit de Crisis. Hoe Europa de wereld kan redden. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.
Von Hagen, J. 1996. Währungsunion, Fiskalunion, Politische Union. Mimeo, Universität Mannheim.
Wolf, M. 2011. Managing the eurozone’s fragility. Financial Times 4. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f30b14f8-75ab-11e0-80d5-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1LMlUathU.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Iain Begg and Alison Howson for comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
De Grauwe, P. (2018). European Monetary Union. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2011
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2011
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences