Skip to main content

Inequality (International Evidence)

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

The methodological assumptions underlying international comparisons of levels and trends in inequality are discussed, starting with the choice of the evaluative space. Empirical evidence shows that at the end of the 1990s, the United States had the highest level of disposable income inequality among high-income economies, while northern and central European countries had the lowest levels. Only in Russia and Mexico, two middle-income economies, was disposable income more unequally distributed. No common trend in inequality is observed since the 1970s across rich nations. Public redistribution through taxes and benefits influence both levels and changes in inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Atkinson, A.B.. 1974. The economics of inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B.. 1997. Bringing income distribution in from the cold. Economic Journal 107: 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B.. 2004. Increased income inequality in OECD countries and the redistributive impact of the government budget. In Inequality, growth, and poverty in an era of liberalization and globalization, ed. G.A. Cornia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B.., and A. Brandolini. 2001. Promises and pitfalls in the use of secondary data-sets: Income inequality in OECD countries as a case study. Journal of Economic Literature 39: 771–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B.., and J. Micklewright. 1992. Economic transformation in Eastern Europe and the distribution of income. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B.., L. Rainwater, and T.M. Smeeding. 1995. Income distribution in OECD countries: The evidence from the Luxembourg income study (LIS). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, T., B. Cantillon, E. Marlier, and B. Nolan. 2002. Social indicators: The EU and social inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani-Turroni, C. 1939. Annual survey of statistical data: Pareto’s law and the index of inequality of incomes. Econometrica 7: 107–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhmann, B., L. Rainwater, G. Schmaus, and T.M. Smeeding. 1988. Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality, and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) database. Review of Income and Wealth 34: 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J.B., and A.F. Shorrocks. 2000. The distribution of wealth. In Handbook of income distribution, ed. A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Amsterdam: North- Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. 2005. Measuring poverty in a growing world (or measuring growth in a poor world). Review of Economics and Statistics 87: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2002. European social statistics – Income, poverty and social exclusion: 2nd report. Data 1994–1997. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding. 1997. Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 633–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding. 2000. Empirical evidence on income inequality in industrialized countries. In Handbook of income distribution, ed. A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immervoll, H., H. Levy, C. Lietz, D. Mantovani, C. O’Donoghue, H. Sutherland and G. Verbist. 2005. Household incomes and redistribution in the European Union: Quantifying the equalising properties of taxes and benefits. Working Paper No. EM9/ 05, EUROMOD.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. 2006. World Economic Outlook, September 2006. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Online. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2006/02/pdf/weo0906.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravis, I.B. 1962. The structure of income. Some quantitative essays. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 45: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. 1963. Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: 8. Distribution of income by size. Economic Development and Cultural Change 11: 1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydall, H.F. 1979. Some problems in making international comparisons of inequality. In Income inequality: Trends and international comparisons, ed. J.R. Moroney. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, M., L. Rainwater, and T.M. Smeeding. 1990. Poverty, inequality, and income distribution in comparative perspective: The Luxembourg Income Study (LIS). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. 1897. Cours d’économie politique. Lausanne and Paris: Rouge & Pichon. Repr. in Oeuvres Complètes, ed. G.-H. Bousquet and G. Busino. Genève: Droz, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. 1976. Income distribution in OECD countries. OECD economic outlook. Occasional studies.. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierminska, E., A. Brandolini, and T.M. Smeeding. 2006. The Luxembourg wealth study – A cross-country comparable database for household wealth research. Journal of Economic Inequality 4: 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T.M. 2004. Twenty years of research on income inequality, poverty, and redistribution in the developed world: Introduction and overview. Socio-Economic Review 2: 149–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeeding, T.M., P. Saunders, J. Coder, S. Jenkins, J. Fritzell, A.J.M. Hagenaars, R. Hauser, and M. Wolfson. 1993. Poverty, inequality, and family living standards impacts across seven nations: The effect of noncash subsidies for health, education, and housing. Review of Income and Wealth 39: 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2005. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Current population reports, P60–229.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1951. National income and its distribution in under-developed countries. Statistical Papers, Series E, No. 3. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E.N. 1996. International comparisons of wealth inequality. Review of Income and Wealth 42: 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2005. World development report 2006. Equity and development. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Brandolini, A., Smeeding, T.M. (2018). Inequality (International Evidence). In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1999

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics