Abstract
The methodological assumptions underlying international comparisons of levels and trends in inequality are discussed, starting with the choice of the evaluative space. Empirical evidence shows that at the end of the 1990s, the United States had the highest level of disposable income inequality among high-income economies, while northern and central European countries had the lowest levels. Only in Russia and Mexico, two middle-income economies, was disposable income more unequally distributed. No common trend in inequality is observed since the 1970s across rich nations. Public redistribution through taxes and benefits influence both levels and changes in inequality.
Keywords
- Atkinson index
- Capability approach
- Consumer price index
- Disposable income
- Expenditure
- Gini index
- Human capital
- Income
- Income inequality
- Inequality (measurement)
- Inequality, international evidence of
- Kuznets, S.
- Lorenz curve
- Luxembourg Income Study
- Market income
- Pareto’s law
- Purchasing power parity
- Redistribution of income
- Relative inequality
- Standard of living
- Theil index
JEL Classifications
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Atkinson, A.B.. 1974. The economics of inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Atkinson, A.B.. 1997. Bringing income distribution in from the cold. Economic Journal 107: 297–321.
Atkinson, A.B.. 2004. Increased income inequality in OECD countries and the redistributive impact of the government budget. In Inequality, growth, and poverty in an era of liberalization and globalization, ed. G.A. Cornia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Atkinson, A.B.., and A. Brandolini. 2001. Promises and pitfalls in the use of secondary data-sets: Income inequality in OECD countries as a case study. Journal of Economic Literature 39: 771–800.
Atkinson, A.B.., and J. Micklewright. 1992. Economic transformation in Eastern Europe and the distribution of income. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Atkinson, A.B.., L. Rainwater, and T.M. Smeeding. 1995. Income distribution in OECD countries: The evidence from the Luxembourg income study (LIS). Paris: OECD.
Atkinson, T., B. Cantillon, E. Marlier, and B. Nolan. 2002. Social indicators: The EU and social inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bresciani-Turroni, C. 1939. Annual survey of statistical data: Pareto’s law and the index of inequality of incomes. Econometrica 7: 107–133.
Buhmann, B., L. Rainwater, G. Schmaus, and T.M. Smeeding. 1988. Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality, and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) database. Review of Income and Wealth 34: 115–142.
Davies, J.B., and A.F. Shorrocks. 2000. The distribution of wealth. In Handbook of income distribution, ed. A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Amsterdam: North- Holland.
Deaton, A. 2005. Measuring poverty in a growing world (or measuring growth in a poor world). Review of Economics and Statistics 87: 1–19.
European Commission. 2002. European social statistics – Income, poverty and social exclusion: 2nd report. Data 1994–1997. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding. 1997. Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. Journal of Economic Literature 35: 633–687.
Gottschalk, P., and T.M. Smeeding. 2000. Empirical evidence on income inequality in industrialized countries. In Handbook of income distribution, ed. A.B. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Immervoll, H., H. Levy, C. Lietz, D. Mantovani, C. O’Donoghue, H. Sutherland and G. Verbist. 2005. Household incomes and redistribution in the European Union: Quantifying the equalising properties of taxes and benefits. Working Paper No. EM9/ 05, EUROMOD.
International Monetary Fund. 2006. World Economic Outlook, September 2006. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Online. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2006/02/pdf/weo0906.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2007.
Kravis, I.B. 1962. The structure of income. Some quantitative essays. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Kuznets, S. 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 45: 1–28.
Kuznets, S. 1963. Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations: 8. Distribution of income by size. Economic Development and Cultural Change 11: 1–80.
Lydall, H.F. 1979. Some problems in making international comparisons of inequality. In Income inequality: Trends and international comparisons, ed. J.R. Moroney. Lexington: Lexington Books.
O’Higgins, M., L. Rainwater, and T.M. Smeeding. 1990. Poverty, inequality, and income distribution in comparative perspective: The Luxembourg Income Study (LIS). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press, Wheatsheaf Books.
Pareto, V. 1897. Cours d’économie politique. Lausanne and Paris: Rouge & Pichon. Repr. in Oeuvres Complètes, ed. G.-H. Bousquet and G. Busino. Genève: Droz, 1964.
Sawyer, M. 1976. Income distribution in OECD countries. OECD economic outlook. Occasional studies.. Paris: OECD.
Sen, A.K. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sierminska, E., A. Brandolini, and T.M. Smeeding. 2006. The Luxembourg wealth study – A cross-country comparable database for household wealth research. Journal of Economic Inequality 4: 375–383.
Smeeding, T.M. 2004. Twenty years of research on income inequality, poverty, and redistribution in the developed world: Introduction and overview. Socio-Economic Review 2: 149–163.
Smeeding, T.M., P. Saunders, J. Coder, S. Jenkins, J. Fritzell, A.J.M. Hagenaars, R. Hauser, and M. Wolfson. 1993. Poverty, inequality, and family living standards impacts across seven nations: The effect of noncash subsidies for health, education, and housing. Review of Income and Wealth 39: 229–256.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2005. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Current population reports, P60–229.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
United Nations. 1951. National income and its distribution in under-developed countries. Statistical Papers, Series E, No. 3. New York: United Nations.
Wolff, E.N. 1996. International comparisons of wealth inequality. Review of Income and Wealth 42: 433–451.
World Bank. 2005. World development report 2006. Equity and development. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Brandolini, A., Smeeding, T.M. (2018). Inequality (International Evidence). In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1999
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1999
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences