Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Poverty Alleviation Programmes

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

This article reviews the issues and evidence concerning a class of policies that aim to reduce poverty by providing direct current relief to those in need and/or by compensating for market and governmental failures that help perpetuate poverty. The article focuses on programmes found in developing countries. Poverty proxies or self-targeting mechanisms are typically used and the specific policies discussed include contingent transfers, community-based programmes, social funds and workfare programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aghion, P., E. Caroli, and C. Garcia-Penalosa. 1999. Inequality and economic growth: The perspectives of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 1615–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderman, H. 1987. Allocation of goods through non-price mechanisms: Evidence on distribution by willingness to wait. Journal of Development Economics 25: 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., and A. Newman. 1994. Poverty, incentives and development. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 84: 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P., and D. Mookherjee. 2000. Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 90: 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P., S. Bowles, and H. Gintis. 2000. Wealth inequality, wealth constraints and economic performance. In Handbook of income distribution, vol. 1, ed. A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J., Sengupta, P. and Todd, P. 2002. Progressing through PROGRESSA: An impact assessment of a school subsidy program. Mimeo: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou, R. 1993. Workings of a city: Location, education and production. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 619–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou, R. 1996. Inequality and growth. In National Bureau of Economic Research macroeconomics annual, ed. B. Bernanke and J. Rotemberg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., and S. Coate. 1992. Workfare vs. welfare: Incentive arguments for work requirements in poverty alleviation programs. American Economic Review 82: 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., and R. Kanbur. 1993. Principles of targeting. In Including the poor, ed. M. Lipton and J. van der Gaag. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., R. Pande, L. Rahman, and V. Rao. 2004. The politics of public good provision: Evidence from Indian local governments. Journal of the European Economic Association 2: 416–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H., K. Deininger, and G. Feder. 1995. Power, distortions, revolt and reform in agricultural and land relations. In Handbook of development economics, vol. 3, ed. J. Behrman and T. Srinivasan. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., and H. Gintis. 1996. Efficient redistribution: New rules for markets, states and communities. Politics and Society 24: 307–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coady, D., M. Grosh, and J. Hoddinott. 2004. Targeting outcomes redux. World Bank Research Observer 19: 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, J., Q.-T. Do, and B. Ozler. 2004. A welfare analysis of conditional cash transfer schemes: Implications for policy. World Bank Research Observe 20: 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. 1993. An inquiry into well-being and destitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datt, G., and M. Ravallion. 1994. Transfer benefits from public works employment: Evidence from rural India. Economic Journal 104: 1346–1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., and A. Sen. 1989. Hunger and public action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, E. 2003. Grandmothers and granddaughters: Old age pension and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa. World Bank Economic Review 17: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. 1996. A theory of persistent income inequality. Journal of Economic Growth 1: 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbers, C., P. Lanjouw, and J. Lanjouw. 2003. Micro-level estimation of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 71: 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S. and K. Sokoloff. 2005. Colonialism, inequality and long-run paths of development. Working Paper No. 11057. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaiha, R. 1996. How dependent are the rural poor on employment guarantee scheme in India? Journal of Development Studies 32: 669–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galasso, E., and M. Ravallion. 2004. Social protection in a crisis: Argentina’s Plan Jefes y Jefas. World Bank Economic Review 18: 367–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galasso, E., and M. Ravallion. 2005. Decentralized targeting of an anti-poverty program. Journal of Public Economics 85: 705–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbach, J., and L. Pritchett. 2000. Indicator targeting in a political economy: Leakier can be better. Journal of Policy Reform 4: 113–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosh, M. 1995. Toward quantifying the trade-off: Administrative costs and incidence in targeted programs in Latin America. In Public spending and the poor: Theory and evidence, ed. D. van de Walle and K. Nead. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, K. 2001. Beyond Rosenstein-Rodan: The modern theory of coordination problems in development. In Proceedings of the annual world bank conference on development economics 2000. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalan, J., and M. Ravallion. 1998. Are there dynamic gains from a poor-area development program? Journal of Public Economics 67: 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalan, J., and M. Ravallion. 2002. Geographic poverty traps? A micro model of consumption growth in rural China? Journal of Applied Econometrics 17: 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalan, J., and M. Ravallion. 2003. Estimating the benefit incidence of an anti-poverty program by propensity-score matching. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21: 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, P., and M. Ravallion. 1995. Poverty and household size. Economic Journal 105: 1415–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M., and M. Ravallion. 1995. Poverty and policy. In Handbook of development economics, vol. 3, ed. J. Behrman and T. Srinivasan. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokshin, M., and M. Ravallion. 2000. Welfare impacts of Russia’s 1998 financial crisis and the response of the public safety net. Economics of Transition 8: 269–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansuri, G., and V. Rao. 2004. Community-based and -driven development. World Bank Research Observer 19: 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L., S. Sumarto, and A. Suryahadi. 2003. Safety nets or safety ropes? Dynamic benefit incidence of two crisis programs in Indonesia. World Development 31: 1257–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. 1993. Poverty alleviation through regional targeting: A case study for Indonesia. In The economics of rural organization: Theory, practice and policy, ed. K. Hoff, A. Braverman, and J. Stiglitz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. 2005a. Transfers and safety nets in poor countries: Revisiting the tradeoffs and policy options. In Understanding poverty, ed. A. Banerjee, R. Bénabou, and D. Mookerjee. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. 2005b. Evaluating anti-poverty programs. In Handbook of agricultural economics, vol. 4, ed. R. Evenson and T. Schultz. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. 2005c. Who is protected? On the incidence of fiscal adjustment. In Macroeconomic policies and poverty reduction, ed. A. Mody and C. Pattillo. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., and G. Datt. 1995. Is targeting through a work requirement efficient? In Public spending and the poor: Theory and evidence, ed. D. van de Walle and K. Nead. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., and Q. Wodon. 2000. Does child labor displace schooling? Evidence on behavioral responses to an enrolment subsidy. Economic Journal 110: C158–C176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., G. Datt, and S. Chaudhuri. 1993. Does Maharashtra’s employment guarantee scheme guarantee employment? Effects of the 1988 wage increase. EconomicDevelopment and Cultural Change 41: 251–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., D. van de Walle, and M. Gautam. 1995. Testing a social safety net. Journal of Public Economics 57: 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., E. Galasso, T. Lazo, and E. Philipp. 2005. Do workfare participants recover quickly from retrenchment? Journal of Human Resources 40: 208–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoulet, E. and A. de Janvry. 2002. Alternative targeting and calibration schemes for educational grants programs: Lessons from PROGRESA. Mimeo. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. 2004. School subsidies for the poor: Evaluating the Mexican PROGRESA poverty program. Journal of Development Economics 74: 199–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skoufias, E. 2005. PROGRESA and its impact on the welfare of rural households in Mexico. Research Report No. 139. Washington, DC: International Food Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnolo, G. 1999. Social relations and cooperation in organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 38: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subbarao, K. 1997. Public works as an anti-poverty program: An overview of crosscountry experience. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79: 678–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, D. 1998. Targeting revisited. World Bank Research Observer 13: 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, D. 2004. Testing Vietnam’s public safety net. Journal of Comparative Economics 32: 661–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2001. World development report: Attacking poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2003. Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2004. World development report: Delivering public services to the poor. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2006. World development report: Equity and development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. http://link.springer.com/referencework/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5

    Martin Ravallion

Authors
  1. Martin Ravallion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ravallion, M. (2018). Poverty Alleviation Programmes. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1996

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation