Abstract
The IS–LM framework is associated with traditional macroeconomics, but versions of IS and LM functions can be justified using dynamic general equilibrium models that assume optimizing behaviour on the part of the private sector. The baseline version of these optimizing IS–LM relationships is discussed. Relative to the traditional IS–LM specification, the IS relationship in the optimizing IS–LM framework involves an extra term, which reflects the dependence of real aggregate demand on the expected level of spending next period. This extra term is implied by the intertemporal behaviour of households.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Aiyagari, S.R., and M. Gertler. 1985. The backing of government bonds and monetarism. Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 19–44.
Bernanke, B.S., and V. Reinhart. 2004. Conducting monetary policy at very low short-term interest rates. American Economic Review 94: 85–90.
Brunner, K., and A.H. Meltzer. 1973. Mr. Hicks and the ‘monetarists’. Economica 40: 44–59.
Dupor, B. 2001. Investment and interest rate policy. Journal of Economic Theory 98: 85–113.
Fane, G. 1985. A derivation of the IS–LM model from explicit optimizing behavior. Journal of Macroeconomics 7: 493–508.
Hall, R.E. 1978. Stochastic implications of the life-cycle-permanent income hypothesis: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy 86: 971–987.
Hicks, J.R. 1937. Mr. Keynes and the ‘Classics’: A suggested interpretation. Econometrica 5: 147–159.
Kerr, W., and R.G. King. 1996. Limits on interest rate rules in the IS Model. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 82: 47–75.
Koenig, E.F. 1989. A simple optimizing alternative to traditional IS–LM analysis. Manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
Koenig, E.F. 1993. Rethinking the IS in IS–LM: Adapting keynesian tools to non-Keynesian economies, part 1. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review 78: 33–49.
McCallum, B.T. 1989. Monetary economics. New York: Macmillan.
McCallum, B.T., and M.S. Goodfriend. 1987. Demand for money: Theoretical studies. In The new palgrave: A dictionary of economics, vol. 1, ed. J. Eatwel, P. Newman, and M. Milgate. London: Macmillan.
McCallum, B.T., and E. Nelson. 1999. An optimizing IS–LM specification for monetary policy and business cycle analysis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 31: 296–316.
Rotemberg, J.J., and M. Woodford. 1997. An optimization-based econometric model for the evaluation of monetary policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 12: 297–346.
Sargent, T.J. 1982. Beyond demand and supply curves in macroeconomics. American Economic Review 72: 382–389.
Sargent, T.J. 1987. Macroeconomic theory, 2nd ed. New York: Academic.
Woodford, M. 1995. Price-level determinacy without control of a monetary aggregate. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 43: 1–46.
Woodford, M. 2003. Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Young, W., and B.Z. Zilberfarb (eds.). 2000. IS–LM and modern macroeconomics. Boston: Kluwer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Additional information
Views expressed in this paper are the author’s and should not be interpreted as those of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, the Federal Reserve System, or the Board of Governors.
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nelson, E. (2018). IS–LM in Modern Macro. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1949
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1949
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences