The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

IS–LM in Modern Macro

  • Edward Nelson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1949

Abstract

The IS–LM framework is associated with traditional macroeconomics, but versions of IS and LM functions can be justified using dynamic general equilibrium models that assume optimizing behaviour on the part of the private sector. The baseline version of these optimizing IS–LM relationships is discussed. Relative to the traditional IS–LM specification, the IS relationship in the optimizing IS–LM framework involves an extra term, which reflects the dependence of real aggregate demand on the expected level of spending next period. This extra term is implied by the intertemporal behaviour of households.

Keywords

Aggregate demand Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models Infinite horizons IS–LM in modern macro IS–LM model Monetarism 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Bibliography

  1. Aiyagari, S.R., and M. Gertler. 1985. The backing of government bonds and monetarism. Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernanke, B.S., and V. Reinhart. 2004. Conducting monetary policy at very low short-term interest rates. American Economic Review 94: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunner, K., and A.H. Meltzer. 1973. Mr. Hicks and the ‘monetarists’. Economica 40: 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dupor, B. 2001. Investment and interest rate policy. Journal of Economic Theory 98: 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fane, G. 1985. A derivation of the IS–LM model from explicit optimizing behavior. Journal of Macroeconomics 7: 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall, R.E. 1978. Stochastic implications of the life-cycle-permanent income hypothesis: Theory and evidence. Journal of Political Economy 86: 971–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hicks, J.R. 1937. Mr. Keynes and the ‘Classics’: A suggested interpretation. Econometrica 5: 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kerr, W., and R.G. King. 1996. Limits on interest rate rules in the IS Model. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 82: 47–75.Google Scholar
  9. Koenig, E.F. 1989. A simple optimizing alternative to traditional IS–LM analysis. Manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.Google Scholar
  10. Koenig, E.F. 1993. Rethinking the IS in IS–LM: Adapting keynesian tools to non-Keynesian economies, part 1. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review 78: 33–49.Google Scholar
  11. McCallum, B.T. 1989. Monetary economics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. McCallum, B.T., and M.S. Goodfriend. 1987. Demand for money: Theoretical studies. In The new palgrave: A dictionary of economics, vol. 1, ed. J. Eatwel, P. Newman, and M. Milgate. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. McCallum, B.T., and E. Nelson. 1999. An optimizing IS–LM specification for monetary policy and business cycle analysis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 31: 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rotemberg, J.J., and M. Woodford. 1997. An optimization-based econometric model for the evaluation of monetary policy. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 12: 297–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sargent, T.J. 1982. Beyond demand and supply curves in macroeconomics. American Economic Review 72: 382–389.Google Scholar
  16. Sargent, T.J. 1987. Macroeconomic theory, 2nd ed. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  17. Woodford, M. 1995. Price-level determinacy without control of a monetary aggregate. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 43: 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Woodford, M. 2003. Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Young, W., and B.Z. Zilberfarb (eds.). 2000. IS–LM and modern macroeconomics. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.