Skip to main content

Education Production Functions

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 156 Accesses

Abstract

The accumulated economic analysis of education suggests that current provision of schooling is very inefficient. Commonly purchased inputs to schools – class size, teacher experience, and teacher education – bear little systematic relationship to student outcomes, implying that conventional input policies are unlikely to improve achievement. At the same time, differences in teacher quality have been shown to be very important. Unfortunately, teacher quality, defined in terms of effects on student performance, is not closely related to salaries or readily identified attributes of teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Angrist, J.D., and V. Lavy. 1999. Using Maimondides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 533–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., P. Grossman, H. Lankford, S. Loeb, and J. Wyckoff. 2006. How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy 1: 176–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S., E.Q. Campbell, C.J. Hobson, J. McPartland, A.M. Mood, F.D. Weinfeld, and R.L. York. 1966. Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A. 1979. Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources 14: 351–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A. 1992. The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy 100: 84–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A. 1999. Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21: 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A. 2003. The failure of input-based schooling policies. Economic Journal 113: F64–F98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A., and D.D. Kimko. 2000. Schooling, labor force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review 90: 1184–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A., S.G. Rivkin, and L.L. Taylor. 1996. Aggregation and the estimated effects of school resources. Review of Economics and Statistics 78: 611–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E.A., J.F. Kain, D.M. O’Brien, and S.G. Rivkin. 2005. The market for teacher quality, Working paper no. 11154. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T.J., J.E. Rockoff, and D.O. Staiger. 2006. What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City, Working paper no. 12155. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A.B.. 1999. Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 497–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E.P. 2003. Teacher incentives. Swedish Economic Policy Review 10(3): 179–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. 1970. The distribution of labor incomes: A survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature 8: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, C.B. 1999. Galton versus the human capital approach to inheritance. Journal of Political Economy 107(pt. 2): S184–S224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnane, R.J., J.B. Willett, Y. Duhaldeborde, and J.H. Tyler. 2000. How important are the cognitive skills of teenagers in predicting subsequent earnings? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19: 547–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G., and H.A. Patrinos. 2004. Returns to investment in education: A further update. Education Economics 12: 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S.G., E.A. Hanushek, and J.F. Kain. 2005. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica 73: 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Word, E., J. Johnston, H.P. Bain, B. DeWayne Fulton, J.B. Zaharies, M.N. Lintz, C.M. Achilles, J. Folger, and C. Breda. 1990. Student/Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR), Tennessee’s K-3 class size study: Final summary report, 1985–1990. Nashville: Tennessee State Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hanushek, E.A. (2018). Education Production Functions. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1930

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics