Abstract
The game nicknamed ‘prisoner’s dilemma’ by A.W. Tucker has attracted wide attention, doubtless because it has raised doubts about the universal applicability of the so called Surething Principle as a principle of rational decision.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.
Lewontin, R.C. 1961. Evolution and the theory of games. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1: 382–403.
Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maynard Smith, J., and G.R. Price. 1973. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246: 15–18.
Oskamp, S. 1971. Effects of programmed strategies on cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma and other mixed-motive games. Journal of Conflict Resolution 15: 225–259.
Rapoport, A. 1985. Applications of game-theoretic concepts in biology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 47: 161–192.
Rapoport, A., and A.M. Chammah. 1965. Prisoner’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Rapoport, A., M. Guyer, and D. Gordon. 1976. The 2 × 2 game. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rapoport, A. (2018). Prisoner’s Dilemma. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1850
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1850
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences