The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Prisoner’s Dilemma

  • Anatol Rapoport
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1850

Abstract

The game nicknamed ‘prisoner’s dilemma’ by A.W. Tucker has attracted wide attention, doubtless because it has raised doubts about the universal applicability of the so called Surething Principle as a principle of rational decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Axelrod, R. 1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lewontin, R.C. 1961. Evolution and the theory of games. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1: 382–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Maynard Smith, J., and G.R. Price. 1973. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246: 15–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Oskamp, S. 1971. Effects of programmed strategies on cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma and other mixed-motive games. Journal of Conflict Resolution 15: 225–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rapoport, A. 1985. Applications of game-theoretic concepts in biology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 47: 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rapoport, A., and A.M. Chammah. 1965. Prisoner’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rapoport, A., M. Guyer, and D. Gordon. 1976. The 2 × 2 game. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anatol Rapoport
    • 1
  1. 1.