The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Rhetoric of Economics

  • Donald N. McCloskey
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1842

Abstract

Rhetoric is the study and practice of persuasive expression, an alternative since the Greeks to the philosophical programme of epistemology. The rhetoric of economics examines how economists persuade – not how they say they do, or how their official methodologies say they do, but how in fact they persuade colleagues and politicians and students to accept one economic assertion and reject another.

Keywords

Rhetoric Rhetoric of economics 

JEL Classifications

B4 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Booth, W. 1974. Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Collins, H.M. 1985. Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, P.J., and R. Hersh. 1981. The mathematical experience. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  4. Henderson, W. 1982. Metaphors in economics. Economics 18 (4): 147–153.Google Scholar
  5. Klamer, A. 1984. Conversations with economists: New classical economists and opponents speak out on the current controversy in macroeconomics. Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
  6. Knight, F. 1940. ‘What is truth’ in economics? Journal of Political Economy 48: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kornai, J. 1983. The health of nations: Reflections on the analogy between medical science and economics. Kyklos 36 (2): 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuhn, T. 1977. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lakatos, I. 1976. Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leamer, E. 1978. Specification searches: Ad hoc inferences with nonexperimental data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Leontief, W. 1971. Theoretical assumptions and nonobserved facts. American Economic Review 61: 1–7.Google Scholar
  12. Mayer, T. 1980. Economics as a hard science: Realistic goal or wishful thinking? Economic Inquiry 18: 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCloskey, D.N. 1986. The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  14. Medawar, P. 1964. Is the scientific paper fraudulent? Saturday Review, 1 August.Google Scholar
  15. Nelson, J., A. Megill, and D.N. McCloskey, eds. 1987. The rhetoric of the human sciences: Papers and proceedings of the Iowa conference. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  16. Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  17. Polanyi, M. 1962. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rorty, R. 1982. The consequences of pragmatism: Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rosen, S. 1980. The limits of analysis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Scott, R. 1967. On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Central States Speech Journal 18 (1): 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stigler, G.J. 1977. The conference handbook. Journal of Political Economy 85: 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Toulmin, S. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald N. McCloskey
    • 1
  1. 1.