Skip to main content

Strategic Reallocations of Endowments

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

In the framework of pure exchange economies it might well happen that economic agents will find it advantageous to change their endowment holdings and by this increase their utility. Such an increase is achieved by acting competitively with the new endowments and comparing the new equilibrium allocation with the one that would have been achieved without the change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aumann, R., and B. Peleg. 1974. A note on Gale’s example. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1: 209–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.N. 1958. Immiserizing growth: A geometrical note. Review of Economic Studies 25: 201–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabszewicz, J.J., and J.H. Dreze. 1971. Syndicates of traders in an economy. In Differential games and related topics, ed. H.W. Kuhn and G. Szego. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D. 1974. Exchange equilibrium and coalitions: An example. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1: 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie, R., and J.J. Laffont. 1978. Advantageous reallocation of initial resources. Econometrica 46(4): 835–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, T. 1983. Immiserizing growth in a many commodity setting. Working Paper, The Johns Hopkins University, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. 1936. Note on the pure theory of capital transfer. In Explorations in economics, Taussig Festschrift, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, R. 1982. Substitutability and the welfare effects of endowment increases. Paper presented at the Econometric Society Meeting in Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A. 1976. En torno a una propiedad poco atractiva del equilibrio competitivo. Moneday Credito [Madrid] 136: 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polterovich, V.M., and V.A. Spivak. 1983. Gross substitutability of point-to-set correspondences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 11(2): 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postlewaite, A. 1979. Manipulation via endowments. Review of Economic Studies 46(2): 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safra, Z. 1983. Manipulation by reallocating initial endowments. Journal of Mathematical Economics 12(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safra, Z. 1985. Existence of equilibrium for Walrasian endowment games. Journal of Economic Theory 37(2): 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, W. 1979. The equilibrium allocations of Walras and Lindahl manipulation games. Discussion Paper, University of Minnesota, Center of Economic Research, no. 111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Safra, Z. (2018). Strategic Reallocations of Endowments. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1806

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics