Skip to main content

Envy

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

Envy is a deadly sin, but then so is avarice or greed, and greed seems not to trouble economists. Envy does, however, perhaps because it is an externality. Different economists have also used the term in different senses. Veblen (1899) avoids the word ‘envy’, but one feels that some of the pleasure of conspicuous consumption may come from the malicious belief that it induces envy in others. Brennan (1973) uses the term ‘malice’ to indicate negative altruism – a distaste for the income of others – and ‘envy’ to indicate that the marginal disutility of another’s income increases as their income increases. For other concepts of envy, see Nozick (1974) and Chaudhuri (1985).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bös, D., and G. Tillmann. 1985. An ‘Envy Tax’: Theoretical principles and applications to the German surcharge on the rich. Public Finance/Finances Publiques 40: 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. 1973. Pareto desirable redistribution: The case of malice and envy. Journal of Public Economics 2: 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A. 1985. Formal properties of interpersonal envy. Theory and Decision 18: 301–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubins, L.E., and E.H. Spanier. 1961. How to cut a cake fairly. American Mathematical Monthly 68: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A., and A. Kirman. 1974. Fairness and envy. American Economic Review 64: 995–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D.K. 1967. Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Economic Essays 7: 45–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pazner, E., and D. Schmeidler. 1974. A difficulty in the concept of fairness. Review of Economic Studies 41: 441–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazner, E., and D. Schmeidler. 1978. Egalitarian equivalent allocations: A new concept of economic equity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 92: 671–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA/Oxford: Harvard University Press/Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D., and K. Vind. 1972. Fair net trades. Econometrica 40: 637–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. 1970. Collective choice and social welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhaus, H. 1948. The problem of fair division. Econometrica 16: 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhaus, H. 1949. Sur la division pragmatique. Econometrica 17: 315–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. 1966. Some formal models of grading principles. Synthese 16: 284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H.R. 1974. Equity, envy and efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory 9: 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. 1899. The Theory of the leisure class, 1967. New York: Macmillan and Viking.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hammond, P.J. (2018). Envy. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_179

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics