The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Senior, Nassau William (1790–1864)

  • N. De Marchi
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1795

Abstract

Early 19th-century English political economists divided on method. Some, Senior among them, favoured Smith’s approach: observe behaviour and try to tie it to likely motives. Others, such as Ricardo and the Mills, preferred to build models based on strong assumptions, then qualify the conclusions while still insisting on their basic truth. On policy questions, and on the basic motives behind economic behaviour, they often agreed, but Smith’s approach allowed for more than one answer to questions such as: what is value? Much ink was spilt and much muddle resulted, clarification (on value) being achieved only with Jevons and Marshall.

Keywords

Abstinence Balance of trade Cairnes, J. E. Distribution Efficient allocation Jones, R. Labour’s share of income Love of ease Marginal productivity theory Marx, K. H. Mercantilism Microfoundations Mill, J. S. Myopia Paper money Political Economy Club Poor Law Profit Rent Ricardo, D. Say, J.-B. Science of political economy Senior, N. W. Smith, A. Value Wages fund Whewell, W. 

JEL Classifications

B31 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bowley, M. 1937. Nassau senior and classical economics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  2. Cairnes, J.E. 1874. Some leading principles of political economy newly expounded. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. De Marchi, N., and R.P. Sturges. 1973. Malthus’ and Ricardo’s inductivist critics: Four letters to William Whewell. Economica 40: 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hollander, S. 1985. The economics of John Stuart Mill, 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Hutchison, T.W. 1938. The significance and basic postulates of economic theory. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, O. 1969. The ‘last hour’ of Senior and Marx. History of Political Economy 1: 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levy, S.L. (ed.). 1928. Industrial efficiency and social economy by Nassau W. Senior, 2 vols. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
  8. Marx, K. 1905–10. Theories of surplus values, 3 vols. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1969; 1972.Google Scholar
  9. Mill, J.S. 1848. Principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy. In Collected works of John Stuart Mill, vols. 2 and 3, ed. J.M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. Ricardo, D. 1822. On protection to agriculture. In The works and correspondence of David Ricardo, vol. 4, ed. P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M.H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Royal Economic Society, 1951.Google Scholar
  11. Stigler, G.J. 1949. The classical economists: An alternative view. In Five lectures on economic problems. London: Longmans, Green for the London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. De Marchi
    • 1
  1. 1.