Skip to main content

Psychology and Economics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

Several developments have joined to stimulate economists to think about issues that have been on the forefront of psychological research. First, the information revolution in economics has focused economists on the subtle nature of individual information processing. Secondly, developments in game theory have so successfully identified new solution concepts that for almost any pattern of market behaviour there exists a reasonable theory consistent with that pattern. Introspection, a few principles of decision making, internal consistency, and a few stylized facts do not constrain possibilities enough to be sufficient guides to theory. Theorists are being forced to seek more systematic sources of data and additional principles to reduce the number of competing theories. Third, the rapid development of experimental methods applicable to economics has brought the testing of psychologically based economic theories within the realm of reality. Economists can accurately measure behaviour in economically relevant settings. As behavioural patterns become established that are difficult to reconcile with economic models alone, the profession has begun to look to psychology for answers. The data thus force the attention of economists to a broader class of models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aizerman, M.A. 1985. New problems in the general choice theory: Review of a research trend. Social Choice and Welfare 2: 235–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S.H. 1983. A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox. Econometrica 51: 1065–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. 1970. The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 73: 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, W.M., and H. Einhorn. 1986. Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review 89: 627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D.M. 1980. Bayes’ rule as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. Quarterly Journal of Economics 95: 537–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D.M., and C.R. Plott. 1979. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economci Review 69: 623–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D.M., and L.L. Wilde. 1984. An analysis of conjunctive choice: Theory and experiments. Journal of Consumer Research 10: 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., and R. Sugden. 1982. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal 92: 805–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., and R. Sugden. 1986. Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies 53: 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.J. 1982. Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica 50: 277–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. 1978. Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics 9: 587–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in econometrics, ed. P. Zarembka, 105–142. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.R. 1986. Rational choice in experimental markets. Journal of Business 59(2): S301–S334, Pt. 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R.J. 1982. Preference reversal: Further evidence and some suggested modifications in experimental design. American Economic Review 72: 576–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M.K. 1971. Rational choice. In Preference, utility and demand, ed. J.S. Chipman et al. San Francisco: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J.E., and B.N. Dosher. 1983. Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9: 676–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1979. Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review 69: 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., and S. Lichtenstein. 1983. Preference reversals: A broader perspective. American Economic Review 73: 596–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Plott, C.R. (2018). Psychology and Economics. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1789

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics