The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Psychology and Economics

  • Charles R. Plott
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1789

Abstract

Several developments have joined to stimulate economists to think about issues that have been on the forefront of psychological research. First, the information revolution in economics has focused economists on the subtle nature of individual information processing. Secondly, developments in game theory have so successfully identified new solution concepts that for almost any pattern of market behaviour there exists a reasonable theory consistent with that pattern. Introspection, a few principles of decision making, internal consistency, and a few stylized facts do not constrain possibilities enough to be sufficient guides to theory. Theorists are being forced to seek more systematic sources of data and additional principles to reduce the number of competing theories. Third, the rapid development of experimental methods applicable to economics has brought the testing of psychologically based economic theories within the realm of reality. Economists can accurately measure behaviour in economically relevant settings. As behavioural patterns become established that are difficult to reconcile with economic models alone, the profession has begun to look to psychology for answers. The data thus force the attention of economists to a broader class of models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Aizerman, M.A. 1985. New problems in the general choice theory: Review of a research trend. Social Choice and Welfare 2: 235–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chew, S.H. 1983. A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox. Econometrica 51: 1065–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Einhorn, H. 1970. The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 73: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldstein, W.M., and H. Einhorn. 1986. Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. Psychological Review 89: 627.Google Scholar
  5. Grether, D.M. 1980. Bayes’ rule as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. Quarterly Journal of Economics 95: 537–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grether, D.M., and C.R. Plott. 1979. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economci Review 69: 623–638.Google Scholar
  7. Grether, D.M., and L.L. Wilde. 1984. An analysis of conjunctive choice: Theory and experiments. Journal of Consumer Research 10: 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Loomes, G., and R. Sugden. 1982. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal 92: 805–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Loomes, G., and R. Sugden. 1986. Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies 53: 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Machina, M.J. 1982. Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica 50: 277–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. March, J.G. 1978. Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice. Bell Journal of Economics 9: 587–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In Frontiers in econometrics, ed. P. Zarembka, 105–142. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Plott, C.R. 1986. Rational choice in experimental markets. Journal of Business 59(2): S301–S334, Pt. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reilly, R.J. 1982. Preference reversal: Further evidence and some suggested modifications in experimental design. American Economic Review 72: 576–584.Google Scholar
  15. Richter, M.K. 1971. Rational choice. In Preference, utility and demand, ed. J.S. Chipman et al. San Francisco: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  16. Russo, J.E., and B.N. Dosher. 1983. Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9: 676–696.Google Scholar
  17. Simon, H.A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simon, H.A. 1979. Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review 69: 493–513.Google Scholar
  19. Slovic, P., and S. Lichtenstein. 1983. Preference reversals: A broader perspective. American Economic Review 73: 596–605.Google Scholar
  20. Thaler, R. 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles R. Plott
    • 1
  1. 1.