Skip to main content

Underconsumptionism

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 201 Accesses

Abstract

‘Underconsumption’ is the label given to theories which attribute the failure of the total output of an economy to continue to be sold at its cost of production (including normal profit) to too low a ratio of consumption to output. According to underconsumption theories, such deficient consumption leads either to goods being able to be sold only at below-normal rates of profit, or to goods not being able to be sold at all. These effects are seen as leading in turn to cutbacks in production and increases in unemployment. Underconsumption theories are thus amongst those which seek to explain cyclical or secular declines in the rate of economic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Baran, P.A., and P.M. Sweezy. 1966. Monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleaney, M. 1976. Underconsumption theories: A history and critical analysis. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazenove, J. 1822. Considerations on the accumulation of capital and its effects on profits and on exchangeable value. London: J.M. Richardson. Published anonymously.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, T. 1832. On political economy, in connexion with the moral state and moral prospects of society. Glasgow: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costabile, L., and R.E. Rowthorn. 1985. Malthus’s theory of wages and growth. Economic Journal 95: 418–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domar, E.D. 1947. Expansion and employment. American Economic Review 37: 34–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, R.V. 1974. The structure of classical economic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltis, W.A. 1980. Malthus’s theory of effective demand and growth. Oxford Economic Papers 32: 19–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmanuel, A. 1969. Unequal exchange: A study of the imperialism of trade. New York: Monthly Review Press. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberler, G. 1937. Prosperity and depression. Geneva: League of Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.A. 1896. The problem of the unemployed. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.A. 1902. Imperialism: A study. London: Nisbet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.A. 1909. The industrial system. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.A. 1922. The economics of unemployment. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.A. 1930. Rationalisation and unemployment. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. 1936. The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J.E. 1981. Perish commerce! Free trade and underconsumption in early British radical economics. Australian Economic Papers 20 (37): 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauderdale, Eighth Earl of. 1804. An inquiry into the nature and origin of public wealth. Edinburgh. Reprinted, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V.I. 1897. A characterisation of economic romanticism (Sismondi and our native Sismondists). In Collected works, ed. V.I. Lenin, vol. 2. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, R. 1913. The accumulation of capital. Trans. A. Schwarzschild, with an introduction by J. Robinson. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, T.R. 1820. Principles of political economy considered with a view to their practical application. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, T.R. 1836. Principles of political economy considered with a view to their practical application. 2nd ed. London: William Pickering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1885. Capital, vol. 2. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummery, A.F., and J.A. Hobson. 1889. The physiology of industry. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemmers, E.E. 1956. Hobson and underconsumption. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. 1932. Consumption and the trade cycle. Economica 12: 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 1949. Mr Harrod’s dynamics. Economic Journal 59: 68–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodbertus, K. 1898. Overproduction and crises. London: Swan Sonnenschein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondi, J.C.L. 1815. Political economy. New York: Kelley. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondi, J.C.L. 1819. Nouveaux principles d’économie politique. Paris: Delaunay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, W. 1807. Britain independent of commerce. In Tracts on political economy. London: Longman, Hurst, Orme & Brown. 1822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P., ed. 1952. Works and correspondence of David Ricardo. Vol. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, P.M. 1942. The theory of capitalist development. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Schneider, M. (2018). Underconsumptionism. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1741

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics