Skip to main content

Strategy-Proof Allocation Mechanisms

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

An allocation mechanism is a function mapping agents’ preferences into allocations. Each agent’s preferences, however, are private to himself, so in reporting them he can misrepresent them if that achieves a more preferable allocation. A strategy-proof allocation mechanism eliminates incentives to misrepresent: each agent, no matter what his preferences are and no matter what preferences other agents report, maximizes by reporting his preferences truthfully. While the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem establishes that no useful strategy-proof allocation mechanisms exist in general, useful ones do exist for a number of specific, economically important classes of allocation problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K. 1951. Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbera, S., H. Sonnenschein, and L. Zhou. 1991. Voting by committees. Econometrica 59: 595–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ching, S. 1997. Strategy-proofness and ‘median voters’. International Journal of Game Theory 26: 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, S., and R.V. Vohra. 2003. Combinatorial auctions: A survey. INFORMS Journal of Computing 15: 284–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M., and R. Farquharson. 1961. Stability in voting. Econometrica 29: 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. 1973. Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result. Econometrica 41: 587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, J., and J.-J. Laffont. 1979. Incentives in public decision-making. Studies in public economics. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, T., and M. Loeb. 1975. Incentives and public inputs. Journal of Public Economics 4: 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurwicz, L., and M. Walker. 1990. On the generic nonoptimality of dominant-strategy allocation mechanisms: A general theorem that includes pure exchange economies. Econometrica 58: 683–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reny, P. 2001. Arrow’s theorem and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem: A unified approach. Economics Letters 70: 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, M. 1975. Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10: 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serizawa, S., and J. Weymark. 2003. Efficient strategy-proof exchange and minimum consumption guarantees. Journal of Economic Theory 109: 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L. 1991. Impossibility of strategy-proof mechanisms in economies with pure public goods. Review of Economic Studies 58: 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Satterthwaite, M.A. (2018). Strategy-Proof Allocation Mechanisms. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1712

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics