Abstract
This term, like many others in financial economics, has no single and precise meaning because over the years debate has come inevitably to reflect the complexity of financial realities. But some pointers towards definition may usefully be made. First, the reference is to tightness of the supply of money relative to the demand for it. Recognition of this point, elementary yet easily overlooked in the heat of practical controversy, immediately indicates the problem that tightness/ease is typically difficult to identify – much less to measure – with any confidence. For example, while interest-rate levels are frequently regarded as appropriate indicators, low and/or falling rates can indicate monetary ease if they reflect supply expanding more rapidly than demand, but could reflect tightness if demand has contracted – say because of collapsing sales and profits – so that equilibrium interest rate levels would be lower still.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Carson, D. (ed.). 1963. Banking and monetary studies. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.
Gurley, J.G., and E.S. Shaw. 1960. Money in a theory of finance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Miller, E., and A. Lonie. 1978. Micro-economic effects of monetary policy. London: Martin Robertson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cramp, A.B. (2018). Tight Money. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1711
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1711
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences