Skip to main content

Preference Reversals

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

Preference reversal is a widely observed behavioural tendency for the preference ordering of a pair of alternatives to depend on the process used to elicit it. The phenomenon appears to be both a robust and a systematic departure from conventional preference theory. Competing theoretical explanations variously interpret it as a violation of procedure invariance (the presumption that preferences should be independent of the method of eliciting them); a failure of transitivity; or a consequence of loss-averse (and reference-dependent) preferences. This article discusses these interpretations, the related evidence, and reflects on some of the broader implications of the phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Becker, G.M., M.H. DeGroot, and J. Marschak. 1964. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science 9: 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, J., and C. Starmer. 2005. Preference anomalies, preference elicitation and the discovered preference hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics 32: 55–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Y.P., and R.L. Chu. 1990. The subsidence of preference reversals in simplified and marketlike experimental settings: A note. The American Economic Review 80: 902–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J.C., and D.M. Grether. 1996. The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets and incentives. Economic Theory 7: 381–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, R.P., A. Munro, and C. Starmer. 2004. Testing explanations of preference reversal. The Econometrics Journal 114: 709–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grether, D., and C.R. Plott. 1979. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. The American Economic Review 69: 623–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C.A. 1986. Preference reversals and the independence axiom. The American Economic Review 76: 508–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, E., and Z. Safra. 1987. “Preference reversal” and the observability of preferences by experimental methods. Econometrica 55: 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., and P. Slovic. 1971. Reversals of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S., and P. Slovic. 2006. The construction of preference. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindman, H.R. 1971. Inconsistent preferences among gambles. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 390–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G.C., and R. Sugden. 1982. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. The Econometrics Journal 92: 805–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G.C., and R. Sugden. 1983. A rationale for preference reversal. The American Economic Review 73: 428–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., C. Starmer, and R. Sugden. 1991. Observing violations of transitivity by experimental methods. Econometrica 59: 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W.W., F. Schneider, and P. Zweifel. 1982. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon: A re-examination. The American Economic Review 73: 569–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R.J. 1982. Preference reversal: Further evidence and some suggested modifications in experimental design. The American Economic Review 73: 576–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. 1954. The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. 1988. Does the preference reversal phenomenon necessarily contradict the independence axiom? The American Economic Review 78: 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, C. 2002. Preference reversal. Journal of Economic Surveys 6: 621–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starmer, C.V. 2000. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 332–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starmer, C., and R. Sugden. 1998. Testing alternative explanations of cyclical choices. Economica 65: 259–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. 2003. Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. Journal of Economic Theory 111: 172–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., S. Sattath, and P. Slovic. 1988. Contingent weighting in judgement and choice. Psychological Review 95: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., P. Slovic, and D. Kahneman. 1990. The causes of preference reversal. The American Economic Review 80: 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Starmer, C. (2018). Preference Reversals. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1692

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics