The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Turnpike Theory

  • Lionel W. McKenzie
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1628

Abstract

This account of turnpike theorems concentrates on the discrete time model, descended from the early von Neumann growth model and the Dosso model. It portrays the current state of the theory under the following five headings: (i) a turnpike in the von Neumann model, (ii) a turnpike in the Ramsey model, (iii) Ramsey models with discounting, (iv) turnpike theorems for competitive equilibria, and (v) further generalizations. It emphasizes von Neumann facets and neighborhood convergence as the author’s principal contribution to the theory. Under (v), it discusses models that allow for habit formation so that current preferences are affected by past consumption, and for non-convex technologies that have an initial phase of increasing returns followed by a terminal phase of decreasing returns. The theorems that have been reviewed are all concerned with the convergence of optimal paths to stationary optimal paths. However, the method of the proofs is to show that optimal paths converge to one another. The considerable literature on continuous time models related to the literature on the investment of the firm and to the engineering literature on optimal control, as well as applications of the asymptotic results of optimal growth theory to the theory of finance, have not been reviewed.

Keywords

von Neumann growth model Ramsey model Asymptotic convergence Neighborhood turnpike theorem Competitive equilibrium Intertemporal resource allocation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Atsumi, H. 1965. Neoclassical growth and the efficient program of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies 32: 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, R.A. 1980. On the long-run steady state in a simple dynamic model of equilibrium with heterogeneous households. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94: 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhabib, J., and K. Nishimura. 1985. Competitive equilibrium cycles. Journal of Economic Theory 35: 284–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bewley, T.F. 1982. An integration of equilibrium theory and turnpike theory. Journal of Mathematical Economics 10: 233–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boldrin, M., and L. Montrucchio. 1986a. On the indeterminacy of capital accumulation paths. Journal of Economic Theory 40: 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boldrin, M., and L. Montrucchio 1986b. Acyclicity and stability for intertemporal optimization models, Working Paper. Rochester: University of Rochester, March.Google Scholar
  7. Boldrin, M. and Montrucchio, L. 1986c. Private communication.Google Scholar
  8. Brock, W.A. 1970. On existence of weakly maximal programmes in a multi-sector economy. Review of Economic Studies 37: 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brock, W.A. 1973. Some results on the uniqueness of steady states in multisector models of optimum growth when future utilities are discounted. International Economic Review 14: 535–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brock, W.A. 1982. Asset prices in a production economy. In The economics of information and uncertainty, ed. J.J. McCall. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brock, W.A., and M. Magill. 1979. Dynamics under uncertainty. Econometrica 47: 843–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brock, W.A., and M. Majumdar. 1978. Global asymptotic stability results for multisector models of optimal growth with uncertainty when future utilities are discounted. Journal of Economic Theory 18: 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brock, W.A., and L. Mirman. 1972. Optimal economic growth and uncertainty the discounted case. Journal of Economic Theory 4: 479–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brock, W.A., and J. Scheinkman. 1976. The global asymptotic stability of optimal control systems with applications to the theory of economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory 12: 164–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brock, W.A., and J. Scheinkman. 1977. The global asymptotic stability of optimal control with applications to dynamic economic theory. In Applications of control theory to economic analysis, ed. J.D. Pitchford and Jose A. Scheinkman. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  16. Brock, W.A., and J. Scheinkman. 1978. On the long-run behavior of a competitive firm. In Equilibrium and disequilibrium in economic theory, ed. G. Schwödiauer. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  17. Cass, D. 1966. Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation: a turnpike theorem. Econometrica 34: 833–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cass, D., and K. Shell. 1976. The structure and stability of competitive dynamical systems. Journal of Economic Theory 12: 31–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cassel, G. 1918. Theoretische Sozialökonomie. Trans. from the 5th German edn. as Theory of Social Economy. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1932.Google Scholar
  20. Coles, J.L. 1985. Equilibrium turnpike theory with constant returns to scale and possibly heterogeneous discount factors. International Economic Review 26: 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dasgupta, S., and L.W. McKenzie. 1985. A note on comparative statics and dynamics of stationary states. Economic Letters 18: 333–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Araujo, A.P., and J.A. Scheinkman. 1977. Smoothness, comparative dynamics, and the turnpike property. Econometrica 45: 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dechert, W.D., and K. Nishimura. 1983. A complete characterization of optimal growth paths in an aggregated model with a non-concave production function. Journal of Economic Theory 31: 332–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dorfman, R., P. Samuelson, and R. Solow. 1958. Linear programming and economic analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Epstein, L.G. 1986. Implicitly additive utility and the robustness of turnpike theorems. Journal of Mathematical Economics 15: 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Epstein, L.G. 1987. The global stability of efficient intertemporal allocations. Econometrica 55: 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evstigneev, I.V. 1974. Optimal stochastic programs and their stimulating prices. In Mathematical models in economics, ed. J. Loś and M. Loś. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  28. Fisher, I. 1930. The theory of interest. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Gale, D. 1956. The closed linear model of production. In Linear inequalities and related systems, ed. H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gale, D. 1967. On optimal development in a multi-sector economy. Review of Economic Studies 34: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grandmont, J.M. 1985. On endogenous business cycles. Econometrica 53: 995–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heal, G., and H. Ryder. 1973. An optimum growth model with intertemporally dependent preferences. Review of Economic Studies 40: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Inada, K. 1964. Some structural characteristics of turnpike theorems. Review of Economic Studies 31: 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keeler, E.B. 1972. A twisted turnpike. International Economic Review 13: 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koopmans, T.C. 1960. Stationary ordinal utility and time perspective. Econometrica 28: 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koopmans, T.C. 1965. The concept of optimal economic growth. In The econometric approach to development planning, Pontificae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia No. 28. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  37. Lucas, R., and N. Stokey. 1984. Optimal growth with many consumers. Journal of Economic Theory 32: 139–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Magill, M.J.P. 1977. Some new results on the local stability of the process of capital accumulation. Journal of Economic Theory 15: 174–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Majumdar, M., and T. Mitra. 1982. Intertemporal allocation with a non convex technology: The aggregative framework. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marimon, R. 1984. General equilibrium and growth under uncertainty: The turnpike property, Discussion paper No. 624. Evanston: North-western University, August, 1984.Google Scholar
  41. McKenzie, L.W. 1963. Turnpike theorems for a generalized Leontief model. Econometrica 31: 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKenzie, L.W. 1968. Accumulation programs of maximum utility and the von Neumann facet. In Value, capital, and growth, ed. J.N. Wolfe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  43. McKenzie, L.W. 1974. Turnpike theorems with technology and welfare function variable. In Mathematical models in economics, ed. J. Loś and M.W. Loś. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  44. McKenzie, L.W. 1976. Turnpike theory. Econometrica 44: 841–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McKenzie, L.W. 1977. A new route to the turnpike. In Mathematical economics and game theory, ed. R. Henn and O. Moeschlin. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. McKenzie, L.W. 1983. Turnpike theory, discounted utility, and the von Neumann facet. Journal of Economic Theory 30: 330–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mill, J.S. 1848. Principles of political economy. London: Parker. New edn, London: Longmans, Green, 1909.Google Scholar
  48. Mitra, T. 1979. On optimal growth with variable discount rates: Existence and stability results. International Economic Review 20: 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Negishi, T. 1960. Welfare economics and existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Metroeconomica 12: 92–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Radner, R. 1961. Paths of economic growth that are optimal with regard only to final states. Review of Economic Studies 28: 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramsey, F. 1928. A mathematical theory of savings. Economic Journal 38: 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Samuelson, P.A. 1966. Market mechanisms and maximization. In The Collected scientific papers of Paul Samuelson, ed. J. Stiglitz, vol. 1, 425–492. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  53. Samuelson, P.A. 1971. Turnpike theorems even though tastes are intertemporally interdependent. Western Economic Journal 9: 21–26.Google Scholar
  54. Samuelson, P.A., and R.W. Solow. 1956. A complete capital model involving heterogeneous capital goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 537–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scheinkman, J. 1976. On optimal steady states of n-sector growth models when utility is discounted. Journal of Economic Theory 12: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Skiba, A.K. 1978. Optimal growth with a convex-concave production function. Econometrica 46: 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Takahashi, H. 1985. Characterizations of optimal programs in infinite horizon economies. PhD thesis, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  58. Treadway, A.B.. 1971. The rational multivariate flexible accelerator. Econometrica 39: 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. von Neumann, J. 1937. Über ein Okonomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinerung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsätzes. Ergebnisse Eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums 8: 73–83. Translated in Review of Economic Studies 13, (1945): 1–9.Google Scholar
  60. von Weiszäcker, C.C. 1965. Existence of optimal programs of accumulation for an infinite time horizon. Review of Economic Studies 32: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weitzman, W.L. 1973. Duality theory for infinite horizon convex models. Management Science 19: 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yano, M. 1984a. Competitive equilibria on turnpikes in a McKenzie economy, I: A neighborhood turnpike theorem. International Economic Review 25: 695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yano, M. 1984b. The turnpike of dynamic general equilibrium paths and its insensitivity to initial conditions. Journal of Mathematical Economics 13: 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yano, M. 1985. Competitive equilibria on turnpikes in a McKenzie economy, II: An asymptotic turnpike theorem. International Economic Review 26: 661–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lionel W. McKenzie
    • 1
  1. 1.