The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Terms of Trade and Economic Development

  • H. W. Singer
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1612

Abstract

One of the most widely discussed theories concerning the terms of trade of developing countries is the Prebisch–Singer hypothesis, independently published in 1950 (Prebisch 1950; Singer 1950). This hypothesis proclaimed a structural tendency for the terms of trade of developing countries to deteriorate in their dealings with industrial countries. In the original form this related mainly to the terms of trade between primary commodities and manufactured goods from the industrial countries. The historical statistical basis was an analysis of British terms of trade during the period 1873–1938 which corresponded to this image of exports of manufactured goods in exchange for primary commodities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Ellsworth, P.T. 1956. The terms of trade between primary producing and industrial countries. Inter-American Economic Affairs 10: 47–65.Google Scholar
  2. Emmanuel, A. 1972. Unequal exchange. New York/London: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  3. Furtado, C. 1964. Development and underdevelopment. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Haberler, G. 1961. Terms of trade and economic development. In Economic development for Latin America, ed. H.S. Ellis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Keynes, J.M. 1938. The policy of government storage of foodstuffs and raw materials. Economic Journal 48: 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewis, W.A. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies 22: 139–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Morgan, T. 1959. The long-run terms of trade between agriculture and manufacturing. Economic Development and Cultural Change 8: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Prebisch, R. 1950. The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. New York: UN Economic Commission for Latin America.Google Scholar
  9. Sapsford, D. 1985. The statistical debate on the net barter terms of trade between primary commodities and manufactures: A comment and some additional evidence. Economic Journal 95(379): 781–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Seers, D. 1983. The political economy of nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Singer, H.W. 1950. The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review 40: 473–485.Google Scholar
  12. Spraos, J. 1980. The statistical debate on the net barter terms of trade between primary commodities and manufactures. The Economic Journal 90(357): 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Spraos, J. 1983. Inequalising trade? Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Spraos, J. 1985. A reply. Economic Journal 95(379): 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thirlwall, A.P. 1983. Growth and development, with special reference to developing economies, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Todaro, M.P. 1969. A model of labour migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. American Economic Review 59(1): 138–148.Google Scholar
  17. Viner, J. 1953. International trade and economic development. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. W. Singer
    • 1
  1. 1.