The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Preobrazhensky, Evgenii Alexeyevich (1886–1937)

  • Michael Ellman
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1602

Abstract

Preobrazhensky was an Old Bolshevik and an original and perceptive Marxist theorist. His main contribution to Marxist political economy concerned the building of socialism in a predominantly agrarian country at a low level of economic development. He argued that socialist accumulation in such a country would require an initial period of original socialist accumulation. That is, economic growth on the basis of investment generated within industry would have to be preceded, in backward Russia with its limited industry, by a period of economic growth on the basis of investment resources obtained from outside the state sector.

Keywords

Accumulation of capital Agriculture and economic development Law of socialist accumulation Marx’s economics New Economic Policy (NEP) (USSR) Over-accumulation Preobrazhensky, E. Socialism Stalin, J. Trotsky, L. 

JEL Classifications

B31 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Day, R. 1975. Preobrazhensky and the theory of the transition period. Soviet Studies 27 (2): 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Erlich, A. 1950. Preobrazhenski and the economics of Soviet industrialization. Quarterly Journal of Economics 64 (1): 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Erlich, A. 1960. The Soviet industrialization debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Filtzer, D. 1978. Preobrazhensky and the problem of the Soviet transition. Critique 9: 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Karshenas, M. 1995. Industrialization and the agricultural surplus: A comparative study of economic development in Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kautsky, K. 1892. Das Erfurter programm. Stuttgart: Dietz.Google Scholar
  7. Marx, K. 1867. Das Kapital. Vol. 1. Hamburg: Otto Meissner.Google Scholar
  8. Millar, J. 1978. A note on primitive accumulation in Marx and Preobrazhensky. Soviet Studies 30 (3): 384–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rakovsky, C. 1931. Na s”ezde i v strane [At the congress and in the country]. Byulleten’ Oppozitsii (25–26): 9–32. Trans. D. Filtzer as ‘The five year plan in crisis’. Critique (1981), No. 13.Google Scholar
  10. Sah, R., and J. Stiglitz. 1984. The economics of price scissors. American Economic Review 74: 125–138.Google Scholar
  11. Sah, R., and J. Stiglitz. 1987. Price scissors and the structure of the economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (1): 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sah, R., and J. Stiglitz. 1992. Peasants versus city-dwellers: Taxation and the burden of economic development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Ellman
    • 1
  1. 1.