Skip to main content

Paradigms

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of a paradigm, in the sense of a dominating principle governing a whole area of scientific research, was invented by Thomas Kuhn (1962), a historian and philosopher of science. One of his starting points was Karl Popper’s view of science, according to which the best scientific theories are falsifiable, viz., such theories could, at least in principle, be refuted by empirical evidence. Popper has argued that theories such as those of Freud and Marx, and the central assumptions of astrology, were unfalsifiable, and that in consequence they were inferior to Newtonian and Einsteinian physics, for example. Kuhn, however, pointed out the already well-known fact that the leading theories of the physical sciences are not straightforwardly falsifiable. On the contrary, a theory such as Newton’s typically requires auxiliary assumptions before it can make any empirical predictions. If such predictions turn out to be false, then logic alone does not determine whether the main theory or one or more of the auxiliaries is at fault, and a person is then at liberty to retain the central theory and to reject one or more auxiliary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Blaug, M. 1976. Kuhn versus Lakatos or paradigms versus research programmes in the history of economics. In Method and appraisal in economics, ed. S.J. Latsis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, N. 1976. Anomaly and the development of economics. In Method and appraisal in economics, ed. S.J. Latsis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, J. 1979. Bayesian personalism, the methodology of scientific research programmes, and Duhem’s problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10: 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, A. 1984. The new classical macro-economics: Conversations with the new classical economists and the opponents. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. 1957. The copernican revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press . 2nd edn, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos and musgrave (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I., and A. Musgrave, eds. 1970. Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latsis, S.J. 1976. A research programme in economics. In Method and appraisal in economics, ed. S.J. Latsis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redhead, M. 1980. A Bayesian reconstruction of the methodology of scientific research programmes. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 11: 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1954. History of economic analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. 1970. Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water? In Lakatos and musgrave (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Urbach, P. (2018). Paradigms. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1538

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics