Skip to main content

Unequal Exchange

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

Marxists have long attempted to explain the uneven development of ‘productive forces’ (labour productivity) and the resulting income differences in the world capitalist economy primarily by means of the ‘surplus drain’ hypothesis (see Emmanuel 1972; Andersson 1976). Adopting Prebisch’s division of the world capitalist economy into the ‘centre’ and ‘periphery’, Marxists have argued that surplus transfer has restrained the economic development of the periphery and exacerbated its income gap vis-à-vis the centre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Amin, S. 1977. Imperialism and unequal development. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. 1976. Studies in the theory of unequal exchange between nations. Abo: Abo Akademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacha, E. 1978. An interpretation of unequal exchange from Prebisch–Singer to Emmanuel. Journal of Development Economics 5(4): 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, O. 1973. International trade and imperialism. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dandekar, V. 1980. Unequal exchange of errors. Economic and Political Weekly 15(13): 645–48. Continued in 16(6): 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Janvry, A., and F. Kramer. 1979. The limits of unequal exchange. Review of Radical Political Economics 11(4): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmanuel, A. 1972. Unequal exchange: A study of the imperialism of trade (with additional comments by Charles Bettelheim). New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. 1984. A critical assessment of some neo-Marxian trade theories. Journal of Development Studies 20(2): 202–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, B. 1980. Unequal exchange: Theoretical issues and empirical findings. Review of Radical Political Economics 12(3): 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. 1975. The theory of economic growth: A critique and reformulation. American Economic Review 65(2): 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liossatos, P. 1979. Unequal exchange and regional disparities. Papers of the Regional Science Association 45: 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, L. 1980. International trade and the transfer of labour values. Journal of Development Studies 17(1): 22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marelli, E. 1980. An intersectoral analysis of regional disparities in terms of transfers of surplus value. Revista internazionale di scienze economiche e commerciali 27(6): 507–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okishio, N. 1963. A mathematical note on Marxian theorems. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 91(2): 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sau, R. 1984. Underdeveloped capitalism and the general law of value. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, A. 1979. Foreign trade and the law of value: Part I. Science and Society 43(3): 281–302. Part II was published in 44(1).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Da Silva, E.A. (2018). Unequal Exchange. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1444

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics