Abstract
The word ‘utopia’ is derived from a Greek term meaning ‘no place’. A utopia is a fictional account of a perfect or ideal society which in its economic aspect is usually stationary and often includes community of goods. Many proposals for social reform have included elements inspired by utopias, and most utopias at least tacitly plead for social change. There is no single utopian tradition and thus no unilinear relationship between ‘utopia’ and the history of economic thought. Insofar as the provision of a subsistence for mankind has been the aim of all forms of normative economic thought, however, the mode of thinking about perfect or harmonious societies termed ‘utopian’ has usually presented itself as the most comprehensive answer to the riddles offered by economic writers. Particularly in the modern period this has involved the use of science and technology to solve economic problems. In turn, the most ambitious plans to settle all economic difficulties have themselves often verged upon the utopian (in the sense of being particularly fanciful or unachievable). A clarification of this relationship requires distinguishing utopian thought from at least four related modes of speculation. In millenarianism, all social problems are disposed of through divine intervention, often in the form of the Second Coming of Christ, at which time a perfect society is founded. In the medieval English poetic vision described in the ‘Land of Cockaygne’ and similar works, all forms of scarcity are dissolved in a fantasy of satiety, where desires remain fixed while their means of satisfaction increase without labour and are consumed without effort. In arcadias, a greater stress is given to the satisfaction of ‘natural’ desires alone and to the equal importance of a spiritual and aesthetic existence. In what has been termed the ‘perfect moral community’ the necessity for a prior change in human nature and especially in human wants is also assumed and more attention is given to spiritual regeneration as the basis of social harmony.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Adams, R.P. 1949. The social responsibilities of science in Utopia, New Atlantis and after. Journal of the History of Ideas 10: 374–398.
Armytage, W.H.G. 1984. Utopias: The technological and educational dimension. In Utopias, ed. P. Alexander and R. Gill. London: Duckworth.
Boguslaw, R. 1965. The new Utopians: A study of system design and social change. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bowman, S. 1973. Utopian views of man and the machine. Studies in the Literary Imagination 6: 105–120.
Claeys, G. 1986. Industrialism and hedonism in Orwell’s literary and political development. Albion 18: 219.
Claeys, G. 1987. Machinery, money and the millennium. From moral economy to socialism. Oxford: Polity Press.
Dautry, J. 1961. Le pessimisme économique de Babeuf et l’histoire des Utopies. Annales Historiques de la Révolution Francaise 33: 215–233.
Davis, J.C. 1981. Utopia and the ideal society. A study of English Utopian writing 1516–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eurich, N. 1967. Science in Utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Farr, J. 1983. Technology in the digger Utopia. In Dissent and affirmation: Essays in honor of Mulford Sibley, ed. A.L. Kalleberg, J.D. Moon, and D. Sabia. Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Popular Press.
Flory, C.R. 1967. Economic criticism in American fiction, 1798 to 1900. New York: Russell & Russell.
Fogg, W.L. 1975. Technology and dystopia. In Utopia/Dystopia? ed. P.E. Richter. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
Fuz, J.K. 1952. Welfare economics in English Utopias from Francis Bacon to Adam Smith. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Gelbart, N. 1978. Science in French enlightenment Utopias. Proceedings of the Western Society for French History 6: 120–128.
Goodwin, B. 1984. Economic and social innovation in Utopia. In Utopias, ed. P. Alexander and R. Gill. London: Duckworth.
Gusfield, J. 1971. Economic development as a modern utopia. In Aware of Utopia, ed. D.W. Plath. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Hall, A.R. 1972. Science, technology and utopia in the seventeenth century. In Science and society 1600–1900, ed. P. Mathias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hont, I., and M. Ignatieff. 1983. Needs and justice in the Wealth of Nations: An introductory essay. In Wealth and virtue: The shaping of political economy in the Scottish enlightenment, ed. I. Hont and M. Ignatieff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, W. 1946. Economic and social thought of Gerrard Winstanley: Was he a seventeenth-century Marxist? Journal of Modern History 18: 1–21.
Hymer, S. 1971. Robinson Crusoe and the secret of primitive accumulation. Monthly Review 23: 11–36.
King, J.E. 1983. Utopian or scientific? A reconsideration of the Ricardian socialists. History of Political Economy 15: 345–373.
Klassen, P.J. 1964. The economics of Anabaptism 1525–60. The Hague: Mouton.
Krieger, R. 1980. The economics of Utopia. In Utopias: The American experience, ed. G.B. Moment and O.F. Kraushaar. London: Scarecrow Press.
Landa, L. 1943. Swift’s economic views and mercantilism. English Literary History 10: 310–335.
Leiss, W. 1970. Utopia and technology: Reflections on the conquest of nature. International Social Science Journal 22: 576–588.
Levitas, R. 1984. Need, nature and nowhere. In Utopias, ed. P. Alexander and R. Gill. London: Duckworth.
MacDonald, W. 1946. Communism in Eden? New Scholasticism 20: 101–125.
MacKenzie, D. 1984. Marx and the machine. Technology and Culture 25: 473–502.
Manuel, F.E., and F.P. Manuel. 1979. Utopian thought in the western world. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Mumford, L. 1967. Utopia, the city and the machine. In Utopias and Utopian thought, ed. F.E. Manuel. Boston: Beacon.
Novak, M. 1976. Economics and the fiction of Daniel Defoe. New York: Russell & Russell.
Perrot, J.-C. 1982. Despotische Verkunft und ökonomische Utopie. In Utopieforschung. Interdisziplinäre Studien zur neuzeitlichen Utopie, ed. W. Vosskamp. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Pocock, J.G.A. 1980. The mobility of property and the rise of eighteenth-century sociology. In Theories of property, Aristotle to the present, ed. A. Parel and T. Flanagan. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press.
Sargent, L.T. 1981. Capitalist eutopias in America. In America as Utopia, ed. K.M. Roemer. New York: Burt Franklin.
Schlaeger, J. 1982. Die Robinsonade als früjbügerliche ‘Eutpia’. In Utopieforschung. Interdisziplinäre Studien zur neuzeitlichen Utopie, ed. W. Vosskamp. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Schoeck, R.J. 1956. More, Plutarch, and King Agis: Spartan history and the meaning of Utopia. Philological Quarterly 35: 366–375.
Segal, H. 1985. Technological Utopianism in American culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Sibley, M.Q. 1973. Utopian thought and technology. American Journal of Political Science 17: 255–281.
Soper, K. 1981. On human needs: Open and closed theories in Marxist perspectives. London: Harvester Press.
Springborg, P. 1981. The problem of human needs and the critique of civilisation. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Steintrager, J. 1969. Plato and more’s Utopia. Social Research 36: 357–372.
Taylor, W.F. 1942. The economic novel in America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Thompson, N.W. 1985. The People’s science. The popular political economy of exploitation and crisis, 1816–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welles, C.B. 1948. The economic background of Plato’s communism. Journal of Economic History 8: 101–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Claeys, G. (2018). Utopias. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1396
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1396
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences