Skip to main content

Patents

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 66 Accesses

Abstract

A patent is the legal right of an inventor to exclude others from making or using a particular invention. This right is sometimes termed an ‘intellectual property right’ and is viewed as an encouragement for innovation. This article gives a brief history of patenting, and discusses the legal and administrative process for obtaining a patent in the major world jurisdictions. Evidence on patent effectiveness in encouraging innovation is surveyed, and the article concludes with a discussion of the use of patent data in economic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arora, A., A. Fosfuri, and A. Gambardella. 2001. Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., M. Ceccagnoli, and W. Cohen. 2003. R&D and the patent premium, Working paper, no. 9431. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arundel, A. 2003. Patents in the knowledge-based economy: Report of the know survey. Maastricht: MERIT, University of Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J.R., P. Hanl, and D. Sabourin. 2000. Determinants of innovative activity in Canadian manufacturing firms: The role of intellectual property rights, Working paper, no. 122. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessen, J., and E. Maskin. 2006. Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation, Working paper. Boston University School of Law and Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessen, J., and M. Meurer. 2005. The patent litigation explosion. Law and economics,Working paper, no. 05-18. Boston University School of Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., J. Van Reenen, and M. Schankerman. 2005. Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry, Discussion paper, no. 3916. London: CEPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., A. Goto, A. Nagata, R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh. 2002. R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Research Policy 31: 1349–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cremers, K. 2004. Determinants of patent litigation in Germany, Discussion paper, no. 04-72. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW).

    Google Scholar 

  • EPO (European Patent Office). 2006. Online. Available at http://www.european-patent- office.org/index.en.php. Accessed 4 Jan 2007.

  • Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2003. To promote innovation – The proper balance of competition and patent law and policy. Washington, DC: FTC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R., and C. Shapiro. 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics 21: 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginarte, J.C., and W. Park. 1997. Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study. Research Policy 26: 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, H., and J.M. Vernon. 1994. Returns to R&D on new drug introductions in the 1980s. Journal of Health Economics 13: 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., ed. 1984. R&D, patents and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., A. Pakes, and B.H. Hall. 1987. The value of patents as indicators of inventive activity. In Economic policy and technological performance, ed. P. Dasgupta and P. Stoneman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z., B.H. Hall, and A. Pakes. 1991. R&D, patents, and market value revisited: Is there a second (technological opportunity) factor? Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1 (3): 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., and R. Ziedonis. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND Journal of Economics 32: 101–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., S. Graham, D. Harhoff, and D.C. Mowery. 2003. Prospects for improving U.S. patent quality via postgrant opposition. Innovation Policy and the Economy 4: 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., A.B.. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics 36: 16–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., F. Narin, F.M. Scherer, and K. Vopel. 1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics 81: 511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., K. Hoisl, and C. Webb. 2006. European patent citations – How to count and how to interpret them? Working paper. University of Munich, CEPR and OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M.A., and R.S. Eisenberg. 1998. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280: 698–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B.., and J. Lerner. 2001. Reinventing public R&D: Patent policy and the commercialization of national laboratory technologies. RAND Journal of Economics 32: 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B.., and M. Trajtenberg. 1996. Flows of knowledge from universities and federal labs: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93: 12671–12677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B.., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B.., M. Trajtenberg, and M. Fogarty. 2000. The meaning of patent citations: Report of the NBER/Case Western Reserve survey of patentees, Working paper no. 763. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • JPO (Japanese Patent Office). 2006. A history of system of industrial property rights. Online. Available at http://www.deux.jpo.go.jp/cgi/search.cgi?query = history&lang = en&root = short. Accessed 19 Dec 2006.

  • Judd, K.L. 1985. On the performance of patents. Econometrica 53: 567–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. 1990. How broad should the scope of patent protection be? RAND Journal of Economics 21: 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe, M. 1992. A comparative study of U.S. and Japanese patent systems. Journal of International Business Studies 23: 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladas and Parry LLP. 2003. A brief history of the patent law of the United States. Online. Available at http://www.ladas.com/Patents/USPatentHistory.html. Accessed 19 Dec 2006.

  • Lanjouw, J.O., and M. Schankerman. 2001. Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. RAND Journal of Economics 32: 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J.O., and M. Schankerman. 2004. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal 114: 441–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. 1995. Patenting in the shadow of competitors. Journal of Law and Economics 38: 463–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. 2002. Patent policy shifts and innovation over 150 years. American Economic Review 92: 221–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R.C., A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson, and S.G. Winter. 1987. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1987 (3): 783–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K.A. 2000. Judges, Juries, and patent cases – An empirical peek inside the black box. Michigan Law Review 99 (281): 365–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, P. 2005. How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world fairs. American Economic Review 95: 1214–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaoka, S. 2006. Reform of patent system in Japan and challenges. Paper presented at the conference on 21st century innovation systems for Japan and the United States: Lessons from a decade of change. Tokyo: Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. 1969. Invention, growth and welfare: A theoretical treatment of technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 1994. The measurement of scientific and technological activities: Using patent data as science and technology indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J.F. 1989. The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion. In Handbook of industrial organization, ed. R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig, vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, M., and L. Branstetter. 2001. Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms. RAND Journal of Economics 32: 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schankerman, M., and A. Pakes. 1986. Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period. Economic Journal 96: 1052–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. 1965. Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented innovations. American Economic Review 55: 1097–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the shoulders of giants. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotchmer, S. 2005. Innovation and incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes: Patent citation and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics 21: 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office). Online. Available at https://www.uspto.gov. Accessed 4 Jan 2007.

  • Webb, C., H. Dernis, D. Harhoff, and K. Hoisl. 2005. Analysing European and international patent citations: A set of EPO patent database building blocks, STI working paper, no. 2005/9. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). Online. Available at https://www.wipo.int/patentscope/en/. Accessed 4 Jan 2007.

  • Wright, B.D. 1983. The economics of invention incentives: Patents, prizes, and research contracts. American Economic Review 73: 691–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziedonis, R.H. 2004. Don’t fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science 50: 804–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziedonis, A.A., R.H. Ziedonis, and B.S. Silverman. 1998. Research consortia and the diffusion of technological knowledge: Insights from SEMATECH, Working paper. University of Michigan and University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hall, B.H. (2018). Patents. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1393

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics