Abstract
Perfect foresight is an occasionally convenient theoretical assumption whose total lack of realism is undisputed, and perhaps unrivalled. There are two elements to perfect foresight; firstly that people have definite point expectations, allowing no uncertainty, of future variables, and secondly that these expectations are correct. In practice, as these fortunate perfectly foresightful individuals generally inhabit models with instantaneously clearing perfectly competitive markets, they only need to forecast prices. The pioneering work by Hicks (1939) on intertemporal general equilibrium theory provides a framework in which the issues associated with perfect foresight can be explored. Writing prior to the development of the expected utility theory of choice under uncertainty (von Neumann and Morgenstern 1944), Hicks had no alternative to a deterministic model in his discussion. He acknowledges the existence and importance of uncertainty in expectation formation, but argues in a somewhat unsatisfactory fashion that point predictions can be interpreted as risk-adjusted summaries of underlying probability distributions. Hicks divides time into weeks. Trade takes place weekly. Supply and demand in each week depend upon decisions made in the past, expectations of spot prices in future weeks, and current spot prices. In temporary equilibrium these spot prices adjust to clear markets, but expectations may be wrong. In the situation which Hicks terms ‘Equilibrium over Time’, markets clear at each date, and, crucially, everyone has perfect foresight; price expectations are fulfilled.
Keywords
- Cobweb model
- Expectations
- Imperfect information
- Intertemporal general equilibrium
- Overlapping generations models
- Perfect foresight
- Probability distribution
- Rational expectations equilibrium
- Stationary state
- Uncertainty
JEL Classifications
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bliss, C.J. 1975. Capital theory and the distribution of income. Amsterdam: North- Holland.
Bray, M.M. 1983. Convergence to rational expectations equilibrium. In Individual forecasting and aggregate outcomes, ed. R. Frydman and E.S. Phelps. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of value: An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. Coules foundation monograph no. 17. New York: Wiley.
Grandmont, J.-M. 1985. On endogenous competitive business cycles. Econometrica 53: 995–1045.
Hicks, J.R. 1939. Value and capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kaldor, N. 1934. A classificatory note on the determinateness of equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 1: 122–136.
Knight, F.H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Muth, J.F. 1961. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29: 315–335.
von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bray, M. (2018). Perfect Foresight. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1350
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1350
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences