The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Land Reform

  • E. V. K. FitzGerald
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1266

Abstract

The redistribution of land property titles by the state is a key issue in poor agrarian countries where land is both the main productive asset and the basis of survival and accumulation for the majority of the population, and thus land tenure is the foundation of the social structure and political power. ‘Agrarian reform’, which encompasses the transformation of rural administrative institutions, labour use and markets as well, is the modern form of this concept. Urban land reform is not dealt with here, as it is usually subsumed under housing policy. Historically, while widespread changes of land tenure have been characteristic of social revolutions since ancient times (Tuma 1965), and classical economic doctrine supported the sweeping away of the feudal land tenure system to permit commercial modernization and stabilize the independent peasantry; the ‘agrarian question’ only becomes a central issue of political economy in the 19th century (Hussain and Tribe 1981).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Barraclough, S. 1973. Agrarian structure in Latin America. Lexington: Heath.Google Scholar
  2. Bettelheim, C. 1975. The transition to socialist economy. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  3. de Janvry, A. 1981. The agrarian question and reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
  4. Dorner, P. 1972. Land reform and economic development. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. FitzGerald, E.V.K. 1985. The problem of balance in the peripheral socialist economy. World Development 13(1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghose, A.K. (ed.). 1983. Agrarian reform in contemporary developing countries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  7. Griffin, K. 1974. The political economy of agrarian change. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Hussain, A., and K. Tribe. 1981. Marxism and the agrarian question. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacoby, E.H. 1971. Man and the land. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
  10. King, R. 1977. Land reform: A survey. London: Bell.Google Scholar
  11. Lardy, N. 1983. Agriculture in China’s modern economic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lehmann, D. 1978. The death of land reform: A polemic. World Development 6(3): 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lipton, M. 1974. Towards a theory of land reform. In Agrarian reform and agrarian reformism, ed. D. Lehmann. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  14. Saith, A. (ed.). 1985. The agrarian question in socialist transition. London: Cass.Google Scholar
  15. Schultz, T.W. 1964. Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Tuma, E.H. 1965. Twenty-six centuries of agrarian reform. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. United Nations. 1976. Progress in land reform: Sixth report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  18. Wadekin, K.E. 1982. Agrarian policies in communist Europe. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  19. Warriner, D. 1969. Land reform in principle and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Wolf, E. 1969. Peasant wars in the twentieth century. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. World Bank. 1974. Land reform. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. V. K. FitzGerald
    • 1
  1. 1.