The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

2018 Edition
| Editors: Macmillan Publishers Ltd

Latent Variables

  • Dennis J. Aigner
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1178

Abstract

A cursory reading of recent textbooks on econometrics shows that historically the emphasis in our discipline has been placed on models that are without measurement error in the variables but instead have stochastic ‘shocks’ in the equations. To the extent that the topic of errors of measurement in variables (or latent variables) is treated, one will usually find that for a classical single-equation regression model, measurement error in the dependent variable, y, causes no particular problem because it can be subsumed within the equation’s disturbance term. But when it comes to the matter of measurement errors in the independent variables, the argument will usually be made that consistent parameter estimation is unobtainable unless repeated observations on y are available at each data point, or strong a priori information can be employed. The presentation usually ends there, leaving us with the impression that the errors-in-variables ‘problem’ is bad enough in the classical regression model and surely must be worse in more complicated models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Aigner, D.J., Hsiao, C., Kapteyn, A. and T. Wansbeek. 1984. Latent variable models in econometrics. Chapter 23 in Handbook of econometrics, ed. Z. Griliches., and M. Intriligator, vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  2. Geraci, V. 1976. Identification of simultaneous equations models with measurement error. Journal of Econometrics 4: 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hsiao, C. 1977. Identification of a linear dynamic simultaneous error-shock model. International Economic Review 18: 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jöreskog, K. 1970. A general method for the analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika 57: 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jöreskog, K.G., and A.S. Goldberger. 1975. Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 631–639.Google Scholar
  6. Maravall, A. and D.J. Aigner. 1977. Identification of the dynamic shock-error model: The case of dynamic regression. Chapter 18 in Latent variables in socioeconomic models, ed. D.J. Aigner., and A.S. Goldberger. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  7. Zellner, A. 1970. Estimation of regression relationships containing unobservable independent variables. International Economic Review 11: 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zellner, A. 1971. An introduction to Bayesian inference in econometrics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis J. Aigner
    • 1
  1. 1.