Abstract
The term ‘merit goods’ has no generally agreed application. It is best applied where individual choice is restrained by community values. It may apply also where charity or political redistribution imposes the donors’ preferences on recipients; in primary redistribution, society may define fair shares in cash or kind, the latter chosen with regard to what are considered meritorious items for the recipient. However, the concept of merit goods remains within the realm of consumer sovereignty when individuals’ ‘higher’ preferences are imposed on their ‘lower’ ones.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Andel, N. 1984. Zum Konzept der meritorischen Güter. Finanz Archiv, New Series 42(3), where extensive literature references are given.
Brennan, G., and L. Lomasky. 1983. Institutional aspects of merit goods analysis. Finanz Archiv, New Series 41: 183–206.
Colm, G. 1965. National goals analysis and marginal utility economics. Finanz Archiv, New Series 24: 209–224.
Galbraith, K. 1958. The affluent society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Harsanyi, J. 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–321.
Head, J.C. 1966. On merit goods. Finanz Archiv, New Series 25(1): 1–29.
Hochman, H.H., and J.D. Rogers. 1969. Pareto-optimal redistribution. American Economic Review 59: 542–557.
Musgrave, R.A. 1957. A multiple theory of budget determination. Finanz Archiv, New Series 17: 333–343.
Musgrave, R.A. 1959. The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
OECD. 1985. The role of the public sector. Paris: OECD.
Pigou, A.C. 1928. A study in public finance. London: Macmillan.
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 317–344.
Smith, A. 1749. The theory of moral sentiments. Reprinted, New York: Liberty, 1969.
Tobin, J. 1970. On limiting the domain of inequality. Journal of Law and Economics 13: 263–277.
Veblen, T. 1899. The theory of the leisure class. New York: New American Library.
Vickrey, W. 1960. Utility, strategy, and social decision rules. Quarterly Journal of Economics 74: 507–535.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Musgrave, R.A. (2018). Merit Goods. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1139
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1139
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences