Skip to main content

Merit Goods

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

The term ‘merit goods’ has no generally agreed application. It is best applied where individual choice is restrained by community values. It may apply also where charity or political redistribution imposes the donors’ preferences on recipients; in primary redistribution, society may define fair shares in cash or kind, the latter chosen with regard to what are considered meritorious items for the recipient. However, the concept of merit goods remains within the realm of consumer sovereignty when individuals’ ‘higher’ preferences are imposed on their ‘lower’ ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 8,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Andel, N. 1984. Zum Konzept der meritorischen Güter. Finanz Archiv, New Series 42(3), where extensive literature references are given.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and L. Lomasky. 1983. Institutional aspects of merit goods analysis. Finanz Archiv, New Series 41: 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colm, G. 1965. National goals analysis and marginal utility economics. Finanz Archiv, New Series 24: 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, K. 1958. The affluent society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, J.C. 1966. On merit goods. Finanz Archiv, New Series 25(1): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, H.H., and J.D. Rogers. 1969. Pareto-optimal redistribution. American Economic Review 59: 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A. 1957. A multiple theory of budget determination. Finanz Archiv, New Series 17: 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A. 1959. The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 1985. The role of the public sector. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.C. 1928. A study in public finance. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1749. The theory of moral sentiments. Reprinted, New York: Liberty, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J. 1970. On limiting the domain of inequality. Journal of Law and Economics 13: 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. 1899. The theory of the leisure class. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. 1960. Utility, strategy, and social decision rules. Quarterly Journal of Economics 74: 507–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Musgrave, R.A. (2018). Merit Goods. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1139

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics