Abstract
Empirical studies of the production process in various industries have demonstrated a positive association between current labour productivity and measures of past activity like past cumulative output or investment (see Wright 1936; Hirsch 1956; Alchian 1963; Hollander 1965; Sheshinski 1967; Boston Consulting Group 1972, 1974, 1978; Lieberman 1984). A hypothesis advanced to explain this is that labour learns through experience and that experience is obtained during the production process. In other words, learning-by-doing is one of the reasons giving rise to dynamic economies of scale, because a firm knows that increasing current production reduces future average costs. If knowledge obtained within one firm cannot be communicated to other firms, we speak of learning without spillovers. There is some empirical evidence, though, that firms cannot totally exclude outsiders from their stock of knowledge, mainly because of labour turnover (see Boston Consulting Group 1978; Lieberman 1984). Learning spillovers are a special case of positive externalities. The study of learning-by-doing, therefore, is a special case in the study of economies characterized by dynamic economies of scale and positive externalities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Abramovitz, M. 1956. Resource and output trends in the U.S. since 1870. Occasional paper no. 52, NBER.
Alchian, A. 1963. Reliability of progress curves in airframe production. Econometrica 31: 679–693.
Arrow, K.J. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 29: 155–173.
Boston Consulting Group. 1972. Perspectives in experience. Technical report.
Boston Consulting Group. 1974. The experience curve reviewed: Price stability. Technical report.
Boston Consulting Group. 1978. Cross sectional experience curves. Technical report.
Fudenberg, D., and J. Tirole. 1983. Learning-by-doing and market performance. Bell Journal of Economics 14: 522–530.
Hirsch, W.Z. 1956. Firm progress ratios. Econometrica 24 (2): 136–144.
Hollander, S. 1965. The source of increased efficiency: A study of DuPont rayon plants. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kendrick, J.W. 1976. The formation and stocks of total capital. New York: NBER.
Levhari, D. 1966. Extensions of Arrow’s learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 33: 117–132.
Lieberman, D. 1984. The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND Journal of Economics 15: 213–228.
Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.
Romer, P., and Sasaki, H. 1985. Monotonically decreasing natural resource prices under perfect foresight. Working paper no. 19, Rochester Center for Economic Research, New York.
Sheshinski, E. 1967. Tests of the learning-by-doing hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics 49: 568–578.
Solow, R. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–320.
Spence, A.M. 1981. The learning curve and competition. Bell Journal of Economics 12: 49–70.
Stokey, N. 1986. The dynamics of industry-wide learning. In Equilibrium analysis: Essays in honor of K.J. Arrow, ed. W.P. Heller, R.M. Starr, and D.A. Starrett, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verdoorn, P.J. 1956. Complementarity and long-range projections. Econometrica 24: 429–450.
Wright, T.P. 1936. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of Aeronautical Sciences 3 (4): 122–128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Vassilakis, S. (2018). Learning-by-Doing. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1127
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1127
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences