Abstract
Few subjects of such conspicuous historical importance have so consistently escaped lucid theoretical exposition as imperialism. The neoclassical economists have made no theoretical gains whatsoever in the field, having chosen to ignore the subject altogether. Their starting and ending point is a short essay borrowed from Schumpeter in which imperialism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is attributed to the atavism of states, acting on feudal and absolutist impulses from an earlier precapitalist era. The field, therefore, has been dominated by Marxists. βTo write about theories of imperialism is already to have a theory,β states Barratt Brown (1972). In modern times, just to use the word is to label what is said as Marxist. The word β like capitalism itself β also implies a theory of broadly construed economic systems and long historical epochs. The sweep of the subject matter is reflected in the breadth of the two major propositions that Marxists have posed: that imperialism and monopoly capitalism are synonymous; and that capitalism underdevelops the third world. The sweep of the subject matter has lent itself to meaningless generalizations and reductionist arguments. But to ignore imperialism altogether on the ground that it is a political phenomenon is to abrogate a responsibility to study a major dimension of economic life, in particular the relationship between the operations of the market and coercive mechanisms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Amin, S. 1976. Unequal development. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Amsden, A.H. September, 1981. An international comparison of the rate of surplus value in manufacturing industries. Cambridge Journal of Economics 5(3): 229β49.
Amsden, A.H. 1985. The state and Taiwanβs economic development. In Bringing the state back in, ed. P. Evans et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bagchi, A. 1982. The political economy of under development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baran, P.A. 1957. The political economy of growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Barratt Brown, M. 1963. After imperialism. London: Merlin Press, 1970.
Barratt Brown, M. 1972. A critique of Marxist theories of imperialism. In Owen and Sutcliffe (1972).
Brenner, R. 1977. The origins of capitalist development: A critique of neo-Smithian Marxism. New Left Review 104, JulyβAugust, 25β92.
Bukharin, N. 1914. Imperialism and world economy. New York: Monthly Review Press. 1972.
Chandler, A. August, 1980. The growth of the transnational industrial firm in the United States and the United Kingdom: A comparative analysis. Economic History Review 33: 396β410.
Engels, F. 1878. Anti-DΓΌhring. New York: International Publishers.
Fieldhouse, K.D. 1966. The colonial empires: A comparative study from the eighteenth century. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Hayes, C.J.H. 1941. A generation of materialism 1871β1900. New York: Harper.
Hilferding, R. 1910. Finance capital: A study of the latest phase of capitalist development. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
Hobson, J.A. 1902. Imperialism: A study. London: Allen & Unwin, 1938.
Hymer, S. 1976. The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lal, D. 1984. The poverty of βDevelopment of economicsβ. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Langer, W.L. 1935. The diplomacy of imperialism 1890β1902, 2nd ed. New York: Knopf.
Lenin, V.I. 1973. Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism. Peking: Foreign Language Press.
Little, I. 1982. Economic development: Theory, policy, and international relations. New York: Basic Books.
Luxemburg, R. 1913. The accumulation of capital. Trans. Agnes Schwarzchild. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1951.
Magdoff, H. 1972. Imperialism without colonies. In Owen and Sutcliffe (1972).
Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1960. On colonialism. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Mommsen, W. 1980. Theories of imperialism. Trans. P.S. Falla. New York: Random House.
Myint, H. 1964. The economics of the developing countries. New York: Praeger.
Myrdal, G. 1957. Rich lands and poor: The road to world prosperity. New York: Harper.
Nurkse, R. 1953. Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Owen, R., and B. Sutcliffe (eds.). 1972. Studies in the theory of imperialism. New York: Longmans.
Reynolds, L.G. 1985. Economic growth in the third world, 1850β1980. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Robinson, R., and Gallagher, R. 1953. The imperialism of free trade. Economic History Review, 2nd Series 6(1): 1β15.
Schumpeter, J. 1919. Imperialism and social classes. Trans. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
Singer, H.W. 1950. The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 40, May, 473β85.
Sutcliffe, B. 1972. Conclusion. In Owen and Sutcliffe (1972).
Stokes, E. 1969. Late nineteenth-century colonial expansion and the attack on the theory of economic imperialism: A case of mistaken identity? Historical Journal 12: 285β301.
United States Department of Commerce (USDC). (Various Years.) Survey of Current Business.
Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, May, 190β207.
Viner, J. 1953. International trade and economic development. Oxford: Clarendon.
Warren, B. 1980. Imperialism: Pioneer of capitalism. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
Β© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Amsden, A.H. (2018). Imperialism. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1049
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1049
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95189-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences