Abstract
Intellectual property refers to patents, copyrights, trademarks and other forms of ownership of ideas. It results in monopoly power that has significant consequences for discouraging as well as encouraging innovation and growth. The discouragement effect is especially important when ideas are used as building blocks for other ideas. The economics literature has examined the need for intellectual property; optimal systems of intellectual property; the optimal duration of intellectual property; how innovation takes place in the absence of intellectual property; and the rent-seeking behaviour induced by intellectual property.
This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume
Bibliography
Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351.
Anton, J., and D. Yao. 1994. Expropriation and inventions: Appropriable rents in the absence of property rights. American Economic Review 84: 190–209.
Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity, ed. R. Nelson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Baccara, M., and R. Razin. 2004. From thought to practice: Appropriation and endogenous market structure with imperfect intellectual property rights. Discussion Paper No. 4419. London: CEPR.
Bessen, J., and R. Hunt. 2003. An empirical look at software patents. Working paper No. 2003–17. Philadelphia: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Boldrin, M., and D. Levine. 2003. Perfectly competitive innovation. Mimeo. University of Minnesota and UCLA. http://www.econ.umn.edu/~mboldrin/Papers/pci39.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2005.
Boldrin, M., and D. Levine. 2005a. IP and market size. Mimeo. University of Minnesota and UCLA. http://www.dklevine.com/papers/scale22.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2005.
Boldrin, M., and D. Levine. 2005b. The economics of ideas and intellectual property. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 1252–1256.
Chari, V., and L. Jones. 2000. A reconsideration of the problem of social cost: Free riders and monopolists. Economic Theory 16: 1–22.
Friedman, D. 1994. Standards as intellectual property: An economic approach. University of Dayton Law Review 19: 1109–1129.
Fudenberg, D., R. Gilbert, J. Stiglitz, and J. Tirole. 1983. Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races. European Economic Review 22: 3–31.
Gallini, N. 1992. Patent policy and costly imitation. RAND Journal of Economics 23: 52–63.
Gallini, N., and S. Scotchmer. 2001. Intellectual property: When is it the best incentive system? Economics Working Papers E01–303. Berkeley: University of California.
Gilbert, R., and C. Shapiro. 1990. Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics 21: 106–112.
Grossman, G., and E. Helpman. 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies 58: 43–61.
Grossman, G., and E.L.-C. Lai. 2004. International protection of intellectual property. American Economic Review 94: 1635–1653.
Harris, C., and J. Vickers. 1985. Patent races and the persistence of monopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics 33: 461–481.
Hellwig, M., and A. Irmen. 2001. Endogenous technical change in a competitive economy. Journal of Economic Theory 101: 1–39.
Herrera, H., and E. Schroth. 2002. Profitable innovation without patent protection: The case of derivatives. Mimeo. Mexico, D.F.: Department of Economics, ITAM. http://ciep.itam.mx/~helios/deriv.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2005.
Herrera, H., and E. Schroth. 2003. Developer’s expertise and the dynamics of financial innovation: Theory and evidence. Mimeo. Mexico, D.F.: Department of Economics, ITAM. http://ciep.itam.mx/~helios/express.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2005.
Hirshleifer, J. 1971. The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity. American Economic Review 61: 561–574.
Hopenhayn, H., and M. Mitchell. 2001. Innovation variety and patent breadth. RAND Journal of Economics 32: 152–166.
Ian, E., and M. Waldman. 1984. The effects of increased copyright protection: An analytic approach. Journal of Political Economy 92: 236–246.
Lamoreaux, N., and K. Sokoloff. 2001. Market trade in patents and the rise of a class of specialized inventors in the nineteenth-century United States. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings 91: 39–44.
Legros, P. 2005. Art and internet: Blessing the curse? Mimeo. Bruxelles: ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
Lessig, L. 2004. Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. New York: Penguin Press.
Liebowitz, S.J. 1985. Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. Journal of Political Economy 93: 945–957.
Moser, P. 2002. How do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth century world fairs. Mimeo. Sloan School of Management, MIT.
Pakes, A.S. 1986. Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica 54: 755–784.
Plant, A. 1934. The economic aspect of copyright in books. Economica 1: 167–195.
Quah, D. 2002. 24/7 Competitive innovation. Mimeo. London School of Economics. http://econ.lse.ac.uk/staff/dquah/p/0204-247.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2005.
Romer, P. 1986. Increasing returns and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1003.
Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98: S71–102.
Shapiro, C. 2001. Navigating the patent thicket: Cross licenses, patent pools and standard setting. In Innovation policy and the economy, ed. A. Jaffe, J. Lerner, and S. Stern, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press for the NBER.
Schumpeter, J. 1911. The theory of economic development, 1934. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Scotchmer, S. 1991. Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 29–41.
Stigler, G. 1956. Industrial organization and economic progress. In The state of the social sciences, ed. L. White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tofuno, P. 1989. First mover advantages in financial innovation. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 350–370.
Vaidhyanathan, S. 2003. Copyrights and copywrongs: The rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity. New York: New York University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 The Author(s)
About this entry
Cite this entry
Boldrin, M., Levine, D.K. (2008). Intellectual Property. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2546-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2546-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences