Skip to main content

Cooperative Equilibrium

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

The term ‘cooperative equilibria’ has been imported into economics from game theory. It refers to the equilibria of economic situations modelled by means of cooperative games and solved by appealing to an appropriate cooperative solution concept. The influence is not entirely one way, however. Many game theoretic notions (e.g. Cournot–Nash equilibrium, the Core) are formalizations of pre-existing ideas in economics.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 1st edition, 1987. Edited by John Eatwell, Murray Milgate and Peter Newman

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aumann, R. 1959. Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. Annals of Mathematics Studies Series 40: 287–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. 1975. Values of markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica 43: 611–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. 1985. An axiomatization of the non-transferable utility value. Econometrica 53: 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R., and M. Maschler. 1964. The bargaining set for cooperative games. In Advances in game theory, ed. M. Dresher, L. Shapley, and A.W. Tucker, 443–447. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D., B. Peleg, and M. Whinston. 1987. Coalition-proof Nash equilibria I. Concepts. Journal of Economic Theory 42: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F. 1881. Mathematical psychics. London: Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. 1959. Contributions to the theory of games. In Contributions to the theory of games, vol. 4, ed. A.W. Tucker and R.D. Luce, 324–356. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. 1985. An axiomatization of Harsanyi nontransferable utility solution. Econometrica 53: 1295–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A. 1985. The potential: a new approach to the value in multiperson allocation problems. Harvard Discussion Paper 1157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A. 1982. Perfect competition and the core. Review of Economic Studies 49: 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. 1953. Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21: 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, H. 1971. On the existence of a cooperative solution for a general class of n-person games. Journal of Economic Theory 3: 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. 1953. A value for n-person games. In Contributions to the theory of games, vol. 2, ed. H. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, 307–317. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. 1969. Utility comparison and the theory of games. In La Décision. Paris: Editions du CNRS, 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L., and M. Shubik. 1969. On the core of an economic system with externalities. American Economic Review 59: 678–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M. 1983. Game theory in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mas-Colell, A. (1987). Cooperative Equilibrium. In: Durlauf, S., Blume, L. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_221-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_221-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics