Skip to main content

Geography of Innovation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management

Abstract

The geography of innovation refers to the spatial clustering of innovative activity and the advantages conferred by co-location. Economic actors realize gains when located to places with abundant resources, well-developed social networks and the chance for serendipitous encounters: all factors that increase the probability of recognizing opportunity and easily solving problems. Location can lower search costs through localized knowledge spillovers and provide access to external scale and scope economies. Firms are one mechanism for organizing economic activity and social networks are another; geography provides an alternative platform that easily brings together resources external to firm and augments social networks through face-to-face interaction.

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acs, Z.J., D.B. Audretsch, and M.P. Feldman. 1994. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics 100: 336–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcacer, J., and W. Chung. 2007. Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science 53: 760–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcacer, J., and M. Gittelman. 2006. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics 88: 774–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., and B. Kogut. 1997. The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation. Small Business Economics 9: 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B., and M.P. Feldman. 1996a. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review 86: 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B., and M.P. Feldman. 1996b. Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle. Review of Industrial Organization 11: 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, J.L., and M.P. Feldman. 2011. The mechanisms of collaboration inventive team composition, social networks, and geography. Research Policy 40: 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm, P., and M.P. Feldman (eds.). 2006. Cluster genesis: Technology-based industrial development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2006. Cross-firm inventors and social networks: Localised knowledge spillovers revisited. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 79(80): 189–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., and F. Lissoni. 2009. Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography 9: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, S., and F. Malerba. 2005. Clusters, networks and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, M.S., and C.R. Pederson. 2005. Social networks in the R&D process: The case of the wireless communication industry around Aalborg, Denmark. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 22: 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, G., and E.L. Glaeser. 1999. The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review 89: 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.P. 1994. The geography of innovation. Boston: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.P. 2001. The entrepreneurial event revisited: An examination of new firm formation in the regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 861–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M.P., and T.D. Zoller. 2012. Dealmakers in place: Social capital connections in regional entrepreneurial economies. Regional Studies 46: 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E.L., and W.R. Kerr. 2009. Local industrial conditions and entrepreneurship: How much of the spatial distribution can we explain? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18: 623–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, M., R. Hornbeck, and E. Moretti. 2010. Identifying agglomeration spillovers: Evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. Journal of Political Economy 118: 536–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10: 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicator: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661–1617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., K. Hoisl, and C. Webb. 2006. European patent citations: How to count and how to interpret them. Unpublished manuscript, Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B.. 1989. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79: 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B.., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson. 1993. Geographic knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B.., M.S. Fogarty, and B.A. Banks. 1998. Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics 46: 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S. 2009. Spinoffs: A review and synthesis. European Management Review 6: 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. [1890] 1948. Principles of economics, 8th ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional development: Silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. 1984. Using linked patent and R&D data to measure interindustry technology flows: R&D, patents, and productivity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., P. Almeida, and G. Wu. 2003. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science 49: 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T., and O. Sorenson. 2003. The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy 32: 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. 2006. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: Evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations. Review of Economics and Statistics 88: 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., and M. Fox-Kean. 2005. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. American Economic Review 95: 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics 21: 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryann P. Feldman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Feldman, M.P. (2016). Geography of Innovation. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_537-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_537-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics