Skip to main content

Psychological Basis of Quality Decision-Making

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management
FormalPara Abstract

Effective strategic management requires analysis, decisions and actions by an organization to create and sustain competitive advantage. Good decisions are clearly desirable, but whether a decision is good or not is a judgement call, often after the fact, and is itself subject to bias. What is less open to debate is the process that leads to accuracy or quality decision-making. This requires not just access to available information but proper processing, interpretation and integration of that data. Consideration of multiple options and perspectives is critical at all stages and there are many reasons why people do not do that. Poor decisions come from ineffective information search, selective bias in processing the information, a lack of alternatives being considered, a failure to examine the risks of the preferred choice and a rush to judgement (Janis and Mann 1979). In short, the selection, interpretation and integration of information are biased.

FormalPara...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bazerman, M., and D. Moore. 2008. Judgment in managerial decision making, 7th ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. 2007. Cognitive dissonance: 50 years of a classic theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. 1972. Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L., and L. Mann. 1979. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. 1982. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, C.J. 1997. Managing innovation: When less is more. California Management Review 40: 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, C.J. 2012. Minority influence theory. In Handbook of theories in social psychology, ed. P. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, and T. Higgins. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeth, C., and J.A. Goncalo. 2005. Influence and persuasion in small groups. In Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives, ed. T.C. Brock and M.C. Green. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R.E., and L. Ross. 1980. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahnemann. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., and R. Saavera. 1996. A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work groups. British Journal of Social Psychology 35: 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C. 1960. On the failure of to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12: 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlan Jeanne Nemeth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Nemeth, C.J. (2016). Psychological Basis of Quality Decision-Making. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_510-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_510-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics