Skip to main content

Concept of Strategy and Organizational Evolution

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 219 Accesses

Abstract

The historical development of the concept of strategy and its role in organizational evolution approached through normative (prescriptive) and positive (descriptive) research lenses is briefly discussed, highlighting the contributions made by scholars rooted in different social science disciplines. A high-level integrative framework – the strategy diamond – is presented. This combines the positional and resource-based approaches to strategy as well as the formulation and implementation aspects of strategy, and proposes that a company’s internal selection environment – reflected in its strategic leadership culture – is key in securing alignment and realignment in the face of a highly dynamic external selection environment.

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Andrews, K.B. 1971. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood: Dow Jones-Irving.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H.I. 1965. Corporate strategy: An analytical approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W.P. 1997. The dynamics of competitive intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 128–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science 32: 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A., and S. Ghoshal. 1989. Managing across borders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J.L. 1970. Managing the resource allocation process. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J.L., and Y.L. Doz. 1978. Strategy formulation: A social and political process. In Strategic management, ed. C. Hofer and D. Schendel. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J.L., and C.G. Gilbert (eds.). 2005. From resource allocation to strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.L., and K.M. Eisenhardt. 1997. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 1969. Optimale grootte in bedrijfseconomisch perspectief. Unpublished Licenciate dissertation, Antwerp University, Faculty of Applied Economics (UFSIA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 1983a. A model of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review 8: 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 1983b. Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Science 29: 1349–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science 2: 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 1994. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 24–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 2002a. Strategy is destiny: How strategy-making shapes a company’s future. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 2002b. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 325–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A., and A.S. Grove. 1996. Strategic dissonance. California Management Review 38: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A., and A.S. Grove. 2007. Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos – Repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management Journal 28: 965–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler Jr., A.D. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R.M., and J.G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aveni, R. 1994. Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., and K. Cool. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35: 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M., and J. Martin. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. 1991. Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golsorkhi, D.E., L. Rouleau, D. Seidel, and E. Vaara (eds.). 2010. Strategy as practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman. 1989. Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijenbrink, J., J.-C. Spender, and A.J. Groen. 2010. The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management 36: 349–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in new product development. Strategic Management Journal 13: 248–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D.A., and H.E. Posen. 2007. Myopia of selection: Does organizational adaptation limit the efficacy of population selection? Administrative Science Quarterly 52: 586–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., and J.G. March. 1988. Organizational learning. In Annual review of sociology, vol. 14, ed. W.R. Scott. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., and K.M. Eisenhardt. 2010. Rewiring: Cross-business unit collaboration in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal 53: 265–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science 24: 934–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., and J. Waters. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal 6: 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., B. Ahlstrand, and J. Lampel. 1998. Strategy safari. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C.A., and M.L. Tushman. 2008. Ambidexterity as dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M.A. 2005. Research complementarities: A resource-based view of the resource allocation process model (and vice versa). In From resource allocation to strategy, ed. J.L. Bower and C.G. Gilbert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1994. Toward a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal 12: 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1996. What is strategy? Harvard Business Review 74: 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K., and R.A. Bettis. 1986. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal 7: 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K., and G. Hamel. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68: 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B. 1980. Strategies for change: Logical incrementalism. Homewood: Dow Jones-Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R.P. 1974. Strategy, structure and economic performance. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saloner, G. 1994. Game theory and strategic management: Contributions, applications, and limitations. In Fundamental issues in strategy, ed. R.P. Rumelt, D.E. Schendel, and D.J. Teece. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N., and D.A. Levinthal. 2005. Escaping real (non-benign) competency traps: Linking the dynamics of organizational structure to the dynamics of search. Strategic Organization 3: 85–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J., and L.T. Wells Jr. 1972. Managing the multinational enterprise. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Burgelman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Burgelman, R.A. (2016). Concept of Strategy and Organizational Evolution. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_386-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_386-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics