Skip to main content

RAND Corporation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

This piece discusses some of the history and ideas present during the first decades at the RAND Corporation, the think tank which became significant during the post WWII years and became an important institution for the mentoring and development of strategic thinking in the US. It also had an important role for the development of important areas in economics and business school perspectives, such as game theory, evolutionary, behavioral and experimental economics, and others; and it also was a place where several key contributors to the strategic management field worked (including Herbert Simon, Sidney Winter, and Richard Nelson).

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Allison, G. 1971. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augier, M., and J. G. March. 2011. The roots, rituals, and rhetorics of change: North American Business Schools after the Second World War. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Augier, M., and A. Marshall. 2017. The fog of strategy: Some organizational perspectives on strategy and the strategic management challenges in the changing competitive environment. Comparative Strategy 36 (4): 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augier, M., J.G. March, and A. Marshall. 2015. The flaring of intellectual outliers: An organizational interpretation of the generation of novelty in the RAND Corporation. Organizaton Science 26 (4): 1140–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornet, V. 1961. RAND: The first fifteen years. RAND document D-9461. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digby, J. 1990. Strategic thought at RAND, 1948–1963: The ideas, their origins, their fates. RAND Note, N-3096. June, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, M. 1958. Some experimental games. Management Science 5 (1): 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, A.L. 1969. The operational code: A neglected approach to the study of political leaders and decision making. International Studies Quarterly 13: 190–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J.R. 1961. RAND: The history, operations, and goals of a non-profit corporation. RAND Corporation Publications, P-2236-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham Allison, and Andrew W. Marshall. 1969. Explanation and prediction of governmental action: An organizational process model. RAND RM-5897-PR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, Olaf. 1957. The game-theoretical approach to organization theory. RAND P-1026, 1. RAND archives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitch, C.J. 1955. An appreciation of systems analysis. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America 3 (4): 466–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitch, C.J. 1956. Fallacies in operations research. Operations Research 4 (4): 422–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, F. 1983. The wizards of Armageddon. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leites, Nathan. 1951. The operational code of the politburo. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1968. Improving intelligence estimates through the study of organizational behavior. Paper presented to the RAND Board of Trustees, 1968. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poundstone, W. 1992. Prisoners dilemma. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, J.R. 1967. “The uses and abuses of systems analysis”. Testimony to Congress during confirmation hearings of James R. Schlesinger to become Secretary of Defense. In Nomination of James R. Schlesinger to be Secretary of Defense Hearing, Ninety-Third Congress. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, J.R. 1989. Nathan Leites: An old world figure in a new world setting. In Remembering Nathan Leites. An appreciation, ed. J. Goldhamer and C. Wolf, 55–62. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1986. Some design and research methodologies in business administration. In La Production des Connaissances scientifique l’administration, ed. M. Audet and J.-L. Malouin, 239–279. Quebec: Les Presses de L’university Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1991. Models of my life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, John, and Morgenstern, Oscar. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. 1970. Scene of change: A lifetime in American science. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. 1961. What is the RAND Corporation? RAND Corporation Publications, D-9446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. 1962. An overview of RAND. RAND Document D-10053. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Much of this entry builds on joint work with James March (esp. Augier and March, chapter 5) and Andrew Marshall (Augier et al. 2015; Augier and Marshall 2017), and I am grateful for their help and collaboration as well as many discussions on the topic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mie Augier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Augier, M. (2017). RAND Corporation. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_231-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_231-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics