Skip to main content

Making Space for Listening to Children in Ireland: State Obligations, Children’s Voices, and Meaningful Opportunities in Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 1456 Accesses

Part of the book series: Geographies of Children and Young People ((GCYP,volume 7))

Abstract

Under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989, all children capable of forming views have the right to express those views in all matters affecting them including within the school space. Further, once the child’s views have been expressed, serious consideration or “due weight” must be given to their views in accordance with the dual criteria of age and maturity. This chapter considers what this legal obligation requires from the point of view of theoretical and practical implementation within the context of Irish schools. The practical challenges posed by listening to children in what may be considered to be a largely authoritarian environment are explored particularly in the context of disciplinary matters such as cyberbullying in schools in Ireland. Moreover, the need to understand through the contemporary geography of children and childhood how and where child participation takes place within the school system is vital in order to ensure that children and young people can most effectively participate in decision-making processes affecting them. Finally, the possibility of adopting a more child-friendly process through a restorative justice framework is explored – one that is focused on creating or making spaces for listening to children where they are given meaningful opportunities to be involved in decision-making processes tailored to their needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   279.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, A. (2002). Responsibilities, rights and restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burford, G. (2005). Families: Their role as architects of civil society and social exclusion. Practice, 17, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COE, Promoting the Participation by Children in decisions affecting them; Recommendation 1864 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D., & Coleman, T. (2008). Social geographies of education: Looking within, and beyond, school boundaries. Geography Compass, 2(1), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. (2009). Family group conferences in child welfare: The fit for restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 12, 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, R. (2002). Restorative justice: Directions and principles – Developments in Canada. Ottawa: Public Works and Government Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossins, A. (2008). Restorative justice and child sex offences. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 359–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, P., & McGilloway, S. (2011). Living in an ‘electronic age’ cyberBullying amongst Irish adolescents. The Irish Journal of Education, xxxix, 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A., & Newburn, T. (2002). Recent developments in restorative justice for young people in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 476–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Skills. (2013a). Anti-bullying procedures for primary and post-primary schools. Government Publications Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Skills. (2013b). Child protection procedures for primary and post-primary schools. Government Publications Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Skills. (2013c). Circular 0045/2013 anti-bullying procedures for primary and post-primary schools. Circular 0045/2013. Government Publications Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evoy, K., Mika, H., & Hudson, B. (2002). Practice, performance, prospects for restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 469–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (1995). Children’s rights in a land of rites. In B. Franklin (Ed.), The handbook of children’s rights: Comparative policy and practice (pp. 70–85). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Cornell, D. (2009). Tolerating adolescent needs: Moving away from zero tolerance policies in high school. Theory Into Practice, 48, 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammarberg, T. (1995). Preface. In B. Franklin (Ed.), The handbook of children’s rights: Comparative policy and practice (pp. ix–xiii). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin, R., & Newell, P. (2002). Implementation handbook for the convention on the rights of the child. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S., & Valentine, G. (2003). Cyberkids: Children in the information age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. L., Jons, H., & Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2010). Geographies of education and the significance of children, youth and families. Progress in Human Geography, 34(5), 583–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, D., Parkes, A., Forde, C., Martin, S., O’Connell, A., & Mages, L. (2015). Seen and not heard: The lived realities of children’s and young people’s participation in Ireland in their homes, schools and communities. University College Cork, School of Law and School of Applied Social Studies. Department of Children and Youth Affairs Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A. (2007). Giving voice to children’s voices: Practices and problems, pitfalls and potentials. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffs, T. (1995). Children’s educational rights in a new ERA? In B. Franklin & B. Franklin (Eds.), The handbook of children’s rights: Comparative policy and practice (pp. 25–39). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorge C Srabstein & Bennett L Leventhal, Prevention of bullying-related morbidity and mortality: a call for public health policies, Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2010;88:403–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, K. P., & Hakli, J. (2011). Tracing children’s politics. Political Geography, 30, 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. (2013). Making circles, making peace. Relational Child and Youth Care Practice, 26(4), 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2008). Restorative justice, therapeutic jurisprudence and the rise of emotionally intelligent justice. Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Justice, 32, 1096–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2011). Every child’s right to be heard: A resource guide on the UN committee on the rights of the child general comment no.12. London: UNICEF, Save the Children, Save the Children Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G., Jimerson, S. R., & Shahroozi, R. (2014). Children’s rights and school psychology: Children’s right to participation. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, N. (2010). Restorative justice through a children’s rights lens. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18, 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall K., Children’s Rights in the Balance: The participation-Protection Debate (Edinburgh: The Stationary Office, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, S. (2009). A system gone berserk: How are zero tolerance policies really affecting schools? Preventing School Failure, 53, 153–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H., Limb, M., & Taylor, M. (1999). Young people’s participation and representation in society. Geoforum, 30, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey, G., Lloyd, G., Stead, J., Kane, J., Riddell, S., & Weedon, E. (2008). ‘I was dead restorative today’: From restorative justice to restorative approaches in school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(2), 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. A., & Mitchell, R. C. (2009). Rights-based restorative justice: Evaluating compliance with international standards. Youth Justice, 9(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S., & Mitchell, R. (2011). Theorising rights-based restorative justice: The Canadian context. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 19, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. (2002). Critiquing the critics: A brief response to critics of restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 595–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B. (2006a). Regulating safe school communities: Being responsive and restorative. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(6), 689–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B. (2006b). School bullying and restorative justice: Toward a theoretical understanding of the role of respect, pride, and shame. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B., Blood, P., & Thorsborne, M. (2005). Practicing restorative justice in school communities: The challenge of culture change. Public Organisation Review: A Global Journal, 5, 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Principals and Deputy Principals. (2014). Hyperlink “http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/report-shows-sharp-increase-in-cyberbullying-over-past-year-1.1702657”,

  • Parkes, A. (2013). Children and international children’s rights law: The right of the child to be heard. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavelka, S. (2013). Practices and policies for implementation: Restorative justice within schools. The Prevention Researcher, 20(1), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, G. (2013). Sixth rapport of the special rapporteur on child protection: A report submitted to the oireachtas. Dublin: Department of Children and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelton, T. (2007). Children, young people, UNICEF and participation. Children’s Geographies, 5(1–2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2009). General comment no. 12: The right of the child to be heard. Geneva: General Comment.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2004). Summary report of the study of the impact of the implementation of the convention on the rights of the child. Florence: UNICEF, Innocenti Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2008). Handbook on legislative reform: Realising children’s rights. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2003). Glossary of humanitarian terms. New York: United Nations, Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Policy Development and Studies Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. (2005). The child care acts-annotated and consolidated (2nd ed.). Dublin: Thomson Roundhall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, Howard & Gohar, Ali (2002) he Little Book of Restorative Justice, Intercoursr, PA: Good Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aisling Parkes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Crown Copyright

About this entry

Cite this entry

Parkes, A. (2016). Making Space for Listening to Children in Ireland: State Obligations, Children’s Voices, and Meaningful Opportunities in Education. In: Kallio, K., Mills, S., Skelton, T. (eds) Politics, Citizenship and Rights. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 7. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-57-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics