Skip to main content

Young Wheelchair Users Play and Recreation

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Play and Recreation, Health and Wellbeing

Part of the book series: Geographies of Children and Young People ((GCYP,volume 9))

Abstract

Despite a rapid increase in research into children and young people’s lives, the experiences of disabled children – and in particular disabled young people – still remain largely overlooked. This chapter offers some reflections on the leisure experiences of young wheelchair users (13–17 years) in their homes and across a range of public spaces. The data that are presented were collected during a multi-method UK-based project which was designed to capture their use of different spaces away from the school environment. The teenagers and their parents discussed the physical and social barriers inherent in these places which impeded on their access to leisure. Their contributions signal the importance of situating the leisure experiences of young people in the context of families. The complex relationships and negotiations between parents and teenagers in accessing leisure are explored, signaling the ways that they work together, or at times in opposition, to open up or close down leisure opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 289.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitchison, C. (2003). From leisure and disability to disability leisure: Developing data, definitions and discourses. Disability and Society, 18(7), 955–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, B. (2003). The community equipment needs of disabled children and their families. York: Social Policy Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, B., & Rhodes, D. (2008). Housing and disabled children. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. (2006). Home. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, R. D. F., Matthews, D. L., & Thomas, C. J. (2007). City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities, 24(3), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, N., Watson, N., & Paterson, K. (2013). Risky bodies in risky spaces: Disabled people’s pursuit of outdoor leisure. Disability and Society, 28(8), 1059–1073. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.749180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childress, H. (2004). Teenagers, territory and the appropriation of space. Childhood, 11(2), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2003). Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Geographical Analysis, 35(9), 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P., & Jones, O. (2005). ‘Unclaimed territory’: Childhood and disordered space(s). Social and Cultural Geography, 6(3), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, L., Bynner, J., & Duckworth, K. (2006). Young people’s leisure contexts and their relation to adult outcomes. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(3), 305–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjortoft, I. (2004). Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children’s play and motor development. Children Youth and Environments, 14(2), 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, R., & Yarwood, R. (2005). Growing up, going out and growing out of the countryside: Childhood experiences in rural England. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. (2007). No fear: Growing up in a risk averse society. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker, C. (2005). Playing and affective time-spaces. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, F. (2004). The health outcomes of housing adaptations. Disability and Society, 19(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixson, E. (2013). Developing young people’s sense of self and place through sport. Annals of Leisure Research, 16(1), 3–15. doi:10.1080/11745398.2013.768156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. (2010). Young people, place & identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, R. (2000). Disabling environments and the geography of access policies and practices. Disability and Society, 15(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, R. (2004). Disability, embodiment and the meaning of home. Housing Studies, 19(5), 745–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, A., & Wheway, R. (2004). Can play, will play: Disabled children and access to outdoor playgrounds. London: National Playing Fields Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2000). Melting geography: Purity, childhood, disorder and space. In S. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning (pp. 29–47). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. (2005). Inclusive leisure opportunities for children and young people aged 8–16 with special educational needs and/or disability in South East England. Stoke On Trent: English Federation of Disability Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin, R. (1998). ‘Out of place’, ‘knowing one’s place’: Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability and Society, 13(3), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A., Petrie, P., Zuurmond, M., & Potts, P. (2009). Mingling together: Promoting the social inclusion of disabled children and young people during the school holidays. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, K. H., Porcellato, L., & Tume, L. (2014). Out-of-school lives of physically disabled children and young people in the United Kingdom: A qualitative literature review. Journal of Child Healthcare, 18(3), 275–285. doi:10.1177/1367493513490446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, S. (2005). Feeling the noise: Teenagers, bedrooms and music. Leisure Studies, 24(4), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, V., Gatherer, A., & Kalsy, S. (2006). Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1386–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H., Beale, L., Picton, P., & Briggs, D. (2003). Modelling access with GIS in urban systems (MAGUS): Capturing the experiences of wheelchair users. Area, 35(1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, S. (1998). Youth, gender and video games: Power and control in the home. In T. Skelton & G. Valentine (Eds.), Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures (pp. 195–206). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, S. (1999). I won’t let her in my room’: Sibling strategies of power and resistance around computer and video games. In J. Seymour & P. Bagguley (Eds.), Relating intimacies: Power and resistance (pp. 246–260). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J., & Madigan, R. (2004). Regulation and innovation: Rethinking ‘inclusive’ housing design. Housing Studies, 19(5), 727–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M., Jones, D., Sloan, D., & Rustin, M. (2000). Children’s independent spatial mobility in the urban public realm. Childhood, 7(3), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, M., Ronzoni, P., & Dogra, N. (2013). Research with children: Theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, P. (2005). Safe routes for children: What they want and what works. Children Youth and Environments, 15(1), 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, R. (2004). Children at risk? Children’s Geographies, 2(1), 65–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. C., Radford, J., & Vickers, M. H. (1998). Disability studies in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 208–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61(1), 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, S., & Wellard, I. (2008). Policies and play: The impact of national policies on children’s opportunities for play. London: Play England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purrington, A., & Hickerson, B. (2013). Leisure as a cross-cultural concept. World Leisure Journal, 55(2), 125–137. doi:10.1080/04419057.2013.782564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyer, M., & Campbell, J. (2013). The ‘other participant’ in the room: The effect of significant adults in research with children. Research Ethics, 9(4), 153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyer, M., & Tucker, F. (2014). “With us, we, like, physically can’t”: Transport, mobility and the leisure experiences of teenage wheelchair users. Mobilities. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.970390. Online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shikako-Thomas, K., Kolehmainen, N., Ketelaar, M., Bult, M., & Law, M. (2014). Promoting leisure participation as part of health and wellbeing in children and youth with Cerebral Palsy. Journal of Child Neurology, 1–9. doi:10.1177/0883073814533422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statham, J., & Chase, E. (2010). Childhood wellbeing: A brief overview. Briefing Paper 1. Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre, University Of Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (1999). ‘Oh please, Mum. Oh please, Dad’: Negotiating children’s spatial boundaries. In L. Mckie, S. Bowlby, & S. Gregory (Eds.), Gender, power and the household (pp. 137–154). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (2004). Public space and the culture of childhood. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G., & Mckendrick, J. (1997). Children’s outdoor play: Exploring parental concerns about children’s safety and the changing nature of childhood. Geoforum, 28(2), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, V., Collins, V., Hatton, C., Emerson, E., Robertson, J., & Wells, E. (2013). Short break and respite services for disabled children in England: Comparing children’s and parents’ perspectives of their impact on children. Children and Society. doi:10.1111/Chso.12001. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray-Lake, L., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2010). Developmental patterns in decision-making autonomy across middle childhood and adolescence: European American parents’ perspectives. Child Development, 81(2), 636–651. doi:10.1111/J.1467-8624.2009.01420.X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L., & Barrett, H. (2001). Adapting visual methods: Action research with Kampala street children. Area, 33(2), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Pyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pyer, M. (2016). Young Wheelchair Users Play and Recreation. In: Evans, B., Horton, J., Skelton, T. (eds) Play and Recreation, Health and Wellbeing. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 9. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-51-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics