Abstract
A brain–computer interface (BCI) is a device that translates the users’ thoughts directly into action. Brain signal patterns used to encode messages are user specific. However, experimental paradigms used to collect neurophysiological trials from individuals are typically data-centered and not user-centered. This means that experimental paradigms are tuned to collect as many trials as possible – which is indeed important for reliable calibration of pattern recognition – and are generally rather demanding and not very motivating or engaging for individuals. Subject cooperation and their compliance with the task may decrease over time. This leads in turn to a high variability of the collected brain signals and thus results in unreliable pattern recognition. One solution to this issue might be the implementation of engaging games instead of the use of standard paradigms to gain and maintain BCI control. This chapter first reviews basic principles and standard experimental paradigms used in BCI training that detect messages expressed by spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythms. Users can independently modulate oscillations by performing appropriate mental tasks. Then, requirements for successful connection of games and these BCI paradigms are outlined in order to provide users with engaging methods to acquire the BCI skill. Last, a novel training concept for BCI in the framework of games is proposed. A recently introduced communication board for users with cerebral palsy is described as example to illustrate game-inspired training paradigms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Recommended Reading
B.Z. Allison, C. Neuper, Could anyone use a BCI? in Brain-Computer Interfaces (Springer, London, 2010), pp. 35–54
B. Blankertz, C. Sannelli, S. Halder, E.M. Hammer, A. Kübler et al., Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance. Neuroimage 51, 1303–1309 (2010)
C.J. Bell, P. Shenoy, R. Chalodhorn, R.P.N. Rao, Control of a humanoid robot by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. J. Neural Eng. 5(2), 214–220 (2008). doi:10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/012
C.M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, New York, 2006)
J. Breuer, G. Brente, J. Comput. Game Culture 4(1), 7–24 (2010)
M. Carter, J. Downs, B. Nansen, M. Harrop, M. Gibbs, Paradigms of games research in HCI: a review of 10 years of research at CHI, in Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY’14) (ACM, 2014)
M. Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, vol. 41 (Harper Perennial, New York, 1991)
S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, L. Nacke, From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification, in Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (ACM, 2011), pp. 9–15
J. Faller, C. Vidaurre, T. Solis Escalante, C. Neuper, R. Scherer, Autocalibration and recurrent adaptation: towards a plug and play online ERD-BCI. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. (2012). doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2189584
M. Fatourechi, A. Bashashati, R.K. Ward, G.E. Birch, EMG and EOG artifacts in brain computer interface systems: a survey. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118(3), 480–494 (2006)
E.V.C. Friedrich, R. Scherer, C. Neuper, The effect of distinct mental strategies on classification performance for brain-computer interfaces. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 84, 86–94 (2012)
E.V.C. Friedrich, C. Neuper, R. Scherer, Whatever works: a systematic user-centered training protocol to optimize brain-computer interfacing individually. PLoS One 8(9), e76214 (2013)
E.V.C. Friedrich, N. Suttie, A. Sivanathan, T. Lim, S. Louchart, A. Pineda, Brain-computer interface game applications for combined neurofeedback and biofeedback treatment for children on the autism spectrum. Front. Neuroeng. 7, 21 (2014). doi:10.3389/fneng.2014.00021
V.A. Holm, The causes of cerebral palsy: a contemporary perspective. JAMA 247(10), 1473–1477 (1982)
A. Isaksen, D. Gopstein, A. Nealen, Exploring game space using survival analysis. Foundations of Digital Games. Best Paper in Artificial Intelligence and Game Technology (2015)
E.R. Kandel, J.H. Schwartz, T.M. Jessel, S.A. Siegelbaum, J. Hudspeth, Principles of Neural Science, 5th edn. (McGraw-Hill Medical, New York, 2014)
S.E. Kober, C. Neuper, Using auditory event-related EEG potentials to assess presence in virtual reality. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 70, 577–587 (2012)
R. Koster, Theory of Fun for Game Design (“O”Reilly Media, Sebastopol, 2013)
G. Krausz, R. Scherer, G. Korisek, G. Pfurtscheller, Critical decision-speed and information transfer in the Graz brain–computer interface. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 28(3), 233–240 (2003)
A. Lecuyer, F. Lotte, R.B. Reilly, R. Leeb, M. Hirose, M. Slater, Brain-computer interfaces, virtual reality, and videogames. Computer 41(10), 66–72 (2008). doi:10.1109/MC.2008.410
F. Lotte, M. Congedo, A. Lécuyer, F. Lamarche, B. Arnaldi et al., A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces. J. Neural Eng. 4, R1–R13 (2007)
F. Lotte, F. Larrue, C. Mühl, Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous brain-computer interfaces: lessons learned from instructional design. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 568 (2013)
S. Mason, A. Bashashati, M. Fatourechi, K. Navarro, G. Birch, A comprehensive survey of brain interface technology designs. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35, 137–169 (2007)
J.D. Millán, R. Rupp, G.R. Müller-Putz, R. Murray-Smith, C. Giugliemma, M. Tangermann, C. Vidaurre, F. Cincotti, A. Kübler, R. Leeb, et al., Combining brain–computer interfaces and assistive technologies: state-of-the-art and challenges. Front. Neurosci. 4, 161 (2010). doi:10.3389/fnins.2010.00161
K. Müller, C.W. Anderson, G.E. Birch, Linear and nonlinear methods for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 11(2), 165–169 (2003). doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814484
G.R. Müller-Putz, R. Scherer, C. Brauneis, G. Pfurtscheller, Steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based communication: impact of harmonic frequency components. J. Neural Eng. 2(4), 123–130 (2005). doi:10.1088/1741-2560/2/4/008
G.R. Müller-Putz, R. Scherer, G. Pfurtscheller, C. Neuper, Temporal coding of brain patterns for direct limp control in humans. Front. Neurosci. 4, 34 (2010). doi:10.3389/fnins.2010.00034
C. Neuper, G.R. Müller, A. Kübler, N. Birbaumer, G. Pfurtscheller, Clinical application of an EEG-based brain-computer interface: a case study in a patient with severe motor impairment. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114(3), 399–409 (2003)
C. Neuper, R. Scherer, M. Reiner, G. Pfurtscheller, Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 25(3), 668–677 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.014
M. Ninaus, S.E. Kober, E.V.C. Friedrich, I. Dunwell, S. Freitas et al., Neurophysiological methods for monitoring brain activity in serious games and virtual environments: a review. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 6(1), 78 (2014). doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2014.060022
E. Niedermeyer, The normal EEG of the waking adult, in Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields (1999), Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 149–173
A. Nijholt, D. Tan, Playing with your brain: brain-computer interfaces and games. In Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology (ACE ‘07). ACM, New York, pp 305–306 (2007)
P.L. Nunez, R. Srinivasan, Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, New York, 2006)
D.G. Oblinger, Games and learning. Educ. Q. 29(3), 5–7 (2006)
G. Pfurtscheller, F.H. Lopes da Silva, Event-related EEG/MRG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110(11), 1842–1857 (1999). doi:10.1016/ S1388-2457(99)00141-8
G. Pfurtscheller, C. Neuper, Motor imagery and direct brain-computer communication. Proc. IEEE 89(7), 1123–1134 (2001)
G. Pfurtscheller, G.R. Müller-Putz, R. Scherer, C. Neuper, Rehabilitation with brain-computer interface systems. Computer 41(10), 58–65 (2008). doi:10.1109/MC.2008.432
J. Pirker, S. Berger, C. Gütl, J. Belcher, P.H. Bailey, Understanding physical concepts using an immersive virtual learning environment, in Proceedings of the 2nd European Immersive Education Summit (2012)
W. Samek, F.C. Meinecke, K.R. Müller, Transferring subspaces between subjects in brain–computer interfacing. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(8), 2289–2298 (2013). doi:10.1109/TBME.2013.2253608
J. Schell, The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2014)
R. Scherer, A. Schlögl, F.Y. Lee, H. Bischof, D. Grassi, G. Pfurtscheller, The self-paced Graz brain-computer interface: methods and applications. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2007, 79826 (2007)
R. Scherer, J. Faller, D. Balderas, E.V. Friedrich, M. Pröll, B. Allison, G. Müller-Putz, Brain–computer interfacing: more than the sum of its parts. Soft Comput. 17(2), 317–331 (2013a)
R. Scherer, G. Moitzi, I. Daly, G.R. Müller-Putz, On the use of games for noninvasive EEG-based functional brain mapping. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 5(2), 155–163 (2013b). doi:10.1109/TCIAIG.2013.2250287
R. Scherer, J. Faller, E.V.C. Friedrich, E. Opisso, U. Costa, A. Kübler, G.R. Müller-Putz, Individually adapted imagery improves brain-computer interface performance in end-users with disability. PLoS One 10(5), e0123727 (2015a). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123727
R. Scherer, M. Billinger, J. Wagner, A. Schwarz, D.T. Hettich, E. Bolinger, M. Lloria Garcia, J. Navarro, G.R. Müller-Putz, Thought-based row-column scanning communication board for individuals with cerebral palsy. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. (2015b). doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2014.11.005
R. Scherer, A. Schwarz, G.R. Müller-Putz, V. Pammer-Schindler, M. Lloria Garcia, Game-based BCI training: interactive design for individuals with cerebral palsy, in Proceedings of the IEEE SMC (2015c), in press
M. Slater, V. Linakis, M. Usoh, R. Kooper, in Immersion, Presence and Performance in Virtual Environments: An Experiment with Tri-Dimensional Chess, ed. G. Mark, in Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology (VRST), 1996, pp. 163–172
W.O. Tatum, B.A. Dworetzky, D.L. Schomer, Artifact and recording concepts in EEG. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 28(3), 252–263 (2011)
C. Vidaurre, C. Sannelli, K.R. Müller, B. Blankertz, Co-adaptive calibration to improve BCI efficiency. J. Neural Eng. 8(2), 025009 (2011)
J. Wolpaw, N. Birbaumer, D.J. McFarland, G. Pfurtscheller, T.M. Vaughan, Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113, 767–791 (2002). doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Scherer, R. et al. (2017). Games for BCI Skill Learning. In: Nakatsu, R., Rauterberg, M., Ciancarini, P. (eds) Handbook of Digital Games and Entertainment Technologies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-50-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-50-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4560-49-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-4560-50-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering