Skip to main content

Citizenship: Inclusion and Exclusion

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter will look at what has been meant by citizenship and analyze debates about citizenship and the criteria used for inclusion in or exclusion from the category of citizen. Place of residence may seem a clear criterion for inclusion. But there were differences between states on this issue even in ancient times with different policies in Athens from those in Rome. Rome made residents of their captured lands “cives sine suffragio,” possibly a doubtful benefit since while these citizens were liable for military service, they could not vote or hold office in Rome. Clearly however being a citizen was generally desirable and was connected with the ability of individuals to have an influence on the kind of community in which they wanted to live and with being able to claim the rights which go along with citizenship status.

In spite of the fact that philosophers from Aristotle through Augustine, Marsilius, Hobbes, Locke, and Kant gave close analysis to the idea of citizenship, in practice the two most important criteria for citizenship in the modern state were being male and being adult. Being white and owning property could be added as two other criteria for citizenship in many states.

These exclusionary criteria have been challenged over the last 200 years. Slaves, indigenous groups, women, and refugees are some of the excluded groups who have challenged their exclusion from citizenship. It is interesting to note that though at the same time women and slaves were gaining recognition as citizens, children were, according to some writers (Schmidt 2003, p. 175), being more excluded from participation in the daily life of the community. However children were not being entirely ignored. A selection of them, again selected using the criteria of gender, class, and color, were being prepared to be citizens. But they were citizens of the future, not of the present.

This chapter goes on to trace the development of children’s rights over the course of the twentieth century, demonstrating the move from seeing the child as passive to seeing the child as a participating citizen. Concepts of rights are closely connected to concepts of citizenship, and disagreements about the nature of rights led to disagreements about the kind of citizenship appropriate for children. The chapter analyzes and critiques some of the rationales given for exclusion of children from citizenship, such as the rationale based on competency and that based on the need for protection. However this writer points out that the arguments of some writers in favor of greater recognition of children’s rights are in danger of showing children once again as being objects of the state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   599.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson, P. (2008). When does citizenship begin? Economics and early childhood. In A. Invernizzi & J. Williams (Eds.), Children and citizenship (pp. 108–119). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archard, D. (2004). Children: Rights and childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archard, D. (2005). Child protection: An holistic view. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 7(2 Sept), 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archard, D., & Macleod, C. M. (2002). The moral and political status of children: New essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneil, B. (2002). Becoming versus being: A critical analysis of the child in liberal theory. In D. Archard & C. M. Macleod (Eds.), The moral and political status of children: New essays (pp. 70–94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V. (Ed.). (1997). Citizenship and exclusion. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, U. (2008). Using children’s GIS maps to influence town planning. Children, Youth and Environments, 18(2), 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, J. (2003, September). The citizenship deficit: On being a citizen child. Development (Suppl. Migration: Citizenship, identity and rights), 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. E. (1989). Assessing the communitarian critique of liberalism. Ethics, 99, 852–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2005). Listening to and involving young children: A review of research and practice. Early Childhood Development and Care, 175(6), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. B. (1994). Citizenship. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady, M. M. (1996). Reflections on children’s rights. In K. Funder (Ed.), Citizen child (pp. 11–31). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady, M. M. (2005a). The continuing importance of thinking that children have rights. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 7(2), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coady, T. (2005b). Questioning holism. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 7(2 Sept), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, T. (2013). Rethinking children’s citizenship. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eekelaar, J. (1992). The importance of thinking that children have rights. International Journal of Law and the Family, 6(1), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farson, R. (1974). Birthrights. London: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fass, P. S. (2012). The Routledge history of childhood in the western world. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (2007). Why it remains important to take children’s rights seriously. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 15(2007), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallacher, L.-A., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research?: Thinking through ‘participatory methods’. Childhood, 15(4), 499–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M. (1991). Rights talk: The impoverishment of political discourse. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R., & Gibson, D. (1997). Rights young and old. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 17(2), 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulart, M. I. M., & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Engaging young children in collective curriculum design. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(Brazil), 533–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafen, B. (1997). Transcript of evidence. Senate Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, 9 May 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafen, B. C., & Hafen, J. O. (1996). Abandoning children to their autonomy: The United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Harvard International Law Journal Spring, 37(2), 449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1973). Bentham on legal rights. In A. W. Simpson (Ed.), Oxford essays in jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. (1975). Escape from childhood: The needs and rights of children. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (1989). Thinking about children. In G. Scarre (Ed.), Children, parents and politics (pp. 36–51). Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. (1998). Seventeenth report, United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koocher, G. B. (1976). Children’s rights and the mental health professions. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, community and culture (pp. 12–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (1994). Return of the citizen: A survey of recent work on citizenship theory. Ethics, 104(2), 352–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydet, D. (2011). Citizenship. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2011 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/citizenship/. Accessed Aug 2013.

  • Marshall, T. H. (1965). Class, citizenship and social development. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1865). On liberty. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1992). Children’s rights and children’s lives. In P. Alston, S. Parker, & S. Seymour (Eds.), Children, rights and the law (p. 39). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfield, A. (2011). The child as democratic citizen. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 633, 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodham, H. (1973). Children under the law. Harvard Education Review, 43, 487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1950/1762). The social contract and discourses (trans: Cole, G. D. H.). New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarre, G. (Ed.). (1999). Children, parents and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. (2012). Children and the state. In P. Fass (Ed.), The Routledge history of childhood in the western world. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrag, F. (2004). Children and democracy: Theory and policy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 3(3), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2009). Child participation in the early years of education. Educating Young Children, 15, 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, O. (1982). Children talking politics: Political learning in childhood. Oxford: Martin Robertson United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Nov 20, 1989, 1577 U.N.T.S. 3 UNCROC.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2005). General comment no. 7: Implementing child rights in early childhood. Geneva United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2009). General comment no. 12: The right of the child to be heard. Geneva United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bueren, G. (1995a). The international law on the rights of the child. Dordrecht/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bueren, G. (1995b). International documents on children (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1989). Citizenship. In E. T. Ball, J. Farr, & R. L. Hanson (Eds.), Political innovation and conceptual change (pp. 211–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret M. Coady .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Coady, M.M. (2015). Citizenship: Inclusion and Exclusion. In: Wyn, J., Cahill, H. (eds) Handbook of Children and Youth Studies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-15-4_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4451-15-4_63

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-4451-14-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-4451-15-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics