This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Habermas, J. (1995). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1906). Das Leben Jesu. Jena: Eugen Diederichs. http://ia301530.us.archive.org/3/items/lebenjesuharmoni00hege/lebenjesuharmoni00hege.pdf. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). System of ethical life and first philosophy of spirit. New York: State University of New York Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2001). Philosophy of right. http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/prindex.htm. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Hume, D. (2004). A treatise of human nature. http://files.libertyfund.org/files/342/0213_Bk.pdf. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Hutcheson, F. (2004). An inquiry into the original of our ideas of beauty and virtue [1726]. http://files.libertyfund.org/files/858/Hutcheson_0449_EBk_v4.pdf. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Kant, I. (1971). Prolegomena to any future metaphysic that will be able to present itself as a science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kant, I. (1996). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork of metaphysic of morals. In L. Pasternack (Ed.), Immanuel Kant: Groundwork the metaphysic of moral in focus. London: Routledge.
Kant, I. (2007). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2015). On education. http://ziveuniverzity.sk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Kant-On-Education.pdf. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development (The philosophy of moral development, moral stages and the idea of justice, Vol. I). San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Kontio, K. (2003). The idea of autarchy in Rousseau’s natural education: Recovering the natural harmony? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(1), 3–19.
Lähde, V. (2008). Rousseau’s rhetoric of “nature”. Tampere: Tampere University Press. http://www.villelahde.fi/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Rousseaus_Rhetoric_of_Nature.pdf.
Mandeville, B. (2004). The fable of the bees: Or, private vices, publick benefits, Vol. 1. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2462. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2016a). A discourse on the sciences and arts. https://webmasters.byuh.edu/faculty/troysmith/BYUH/Classes/Philosophy/Rousseau%20–%20First%20Discourse.pdf. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Rousseau, J.-J. (2016b). Discourse on inequality. https://www.aub.edu.lb/fas/cvsp/Documents/DiscourseonInequality.pdf879500092.pdf. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Shaftesbury [Anthony Ashley Cooper]. (2004). An inquiry concerning virtue or merit. http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/shaftesbury1711book1.pdf. Cited 9.1. 2016.
Siegel, H. (1986). On using psychology to justify judgments of moral adequacy. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg – consensus and controversy (pp. 65–78). East Sussex: The Falmer Press.
Smith, A. (1973). The wealth of nations. Suffolk: Penguin.
Smith, A. (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Huttunen, R., Kakkori, L. (2016). The Philosophical Roots of Gilligan-Kohlberg Controversy. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_416-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_416-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education