Skip to main content

Heidegger’s Enframing and the Indigenous Self in Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 301 Accesses

Introduction

Aspects of Heidegger’s personal life scream out to be confronted, especially when it is the indigenous writer referring to him and even if his sinister idiosyncrasies in that instance are not the key theme of that writer’s text. The controversy of Heidegger – that he “wrote some really frightful rubbish, some of which explicitly links his philosophy to the most abominable political movement of the modern period” (Bowie 1997, p. 139) – must surely be at stake in any indigenous comparative that seeks to draw on his works. He was, after all, supportive of the extermination of a group of people: such a nasty complicity will not be lost on the indigenous scholar. The recent release of his notorious Black Notebooks only further confirms his involvement. Yet his philosophy on the dark recesses of colonization that force an object to appear in advance as constrained thing is, for indigenous counter-colonial purposes, compelling and amounts to “anything but rubbish” (Bowie 1997,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowie, A. (1997). From romanticism to critical theory: The philosophy of German literary theory. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deloria, V., Jr. (2001). American Indian metaphysics. In V. Deloria Jr. & D. Wildcat (Eds.), Power and place: Indian education in America (pp. 1–6). Golden: Fulcrum Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, P. (2002). Enframing education. In M. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education and modernity (pp. 171–190). Oxford: Rowman &n Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1967). Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, J. & Robinson, E.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (trans: Lovitt, W.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1999). Letter on ‘humanism’ (trans: Capuzzi, F.). In W. McNeill (Ed.), Pathmarks (pp. 239–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mika, C. (2014). The enowning of thought and whakapapa: Heidegger’s fourfold. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 13, 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mika, C. (2015). The thing’s revelation: Māori philosophical research. Waikato Journal of Education, 20(2). doi:10.15663/wje.v20i2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plebuch, D. (2010). Heidegger’s fourfold (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana IL). Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu

  • Richardson, W. (2003). Heidegger: Through phenomenology to thought (4th ed.). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Mika .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mika, C. (2016). Heidegger’s Enframing and the Indigenous Self in Education. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_135-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_135-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics