Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

new literacies, New Literacies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams, S. S. (2015). Historical trends and contemporary practices. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 354–368). NewYork: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. W. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English-language learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research In Education, 24, 61–100. doi:10.2307/1167267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castek, J., Beach, R., Cotanch, H., & Scott, J. (2014). Examining middle-school students’ uses of Diigo annotations to engage in collaborative argumentative writing. In R. S. Anderson & C. Mimms (Eds.), Handbook of research on digital tools for writing instruction in K-12 settings (pp. 80–101). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An international journal, 4(3), 164–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flesch, R. (1981). Why Johnny still can’t read. NewYork: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). NewYork: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. S. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer, & R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (2nd ed., pp. 497–508). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2012). Twitteracy: Tweeting as a new literacy practice. The Educational Forum, 76(4), 464–478. doi:10.1080/00131725.2012.709032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Judd, A., Finn, M., Law, A., Manion, A., Mitnick, S., Schlossberg, D., Yardi, S., & Horst, H. A. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. E. (2013). Reimagining multiliteracies: A response to Leander and Boldt. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(4), 270–273. doi:10.1002/JAAL.249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., & Bonner, R. L. (2015). Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics, 136(6), 1044–1050. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-2151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, C. K. (2010). Considering literacy and policy in the context of digital environments. Language Arts, 88(1), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, C. K., Hoffman, D., Turkay, S., Gunbaş, N., & Chantes, P. (2011). Exploring motivation and comprehension of a narrative in a video game, book, and comic book format. NRC Yearbook, 60, 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzer, C. K., Turkay, S., Hoffman, D. L., Gunbas, N., Chantes, P., Chaiwinij, A., & Dvorkin, T. (2012). Examining the effects of text and images on story comprehension: An eye-tracking study of reading in a video game and comic book. In P. J. Dunston, S. K. Fullerton, C. C. Bates, K. Headley, & P. M. Stecker (Eds.), Literacy research association yearbook 61 (pp. 259–275). Chicago: LRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014). Studying new literacies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203164754.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning. NewYork: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies” bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743–770). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New Literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. Alvermann, N. Unruh, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (8th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Timbrell, N., & Maykel, C. (2015a). Seeing the forest, not the trees: Essential technologies for literacy in the primary-grade and upper elementary-grade classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015b). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59. doi:10.1002/rrq.85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E. B. (2015). Youth cultures, literacies, and identities in and out of school. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts, volume II (pp. 207–219). NewYork: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, D. D. (2007). First steps and beyond: Serious games as preparation for future learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(3), 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, J. (2012, May 2). How to break free of our 19th-century factory-model education system. The Atlantic. Available: http://theatln.tc/1dmztXv

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (1994). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 1057–1092). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K. (2011). Quest to learn: Developing the school for digital kids. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, T. (1990). Reading and writing together: What does it really mean? In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Reading and writing together: New perspectives for the classroom (pp. 1–18). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. N., Hagood, M. C., & Provost, M. C. (2014). Creating a new literacies coaching ethos. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(3), 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. (2003). What’s new in new literacy studies? Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasudevan, L. (2014). Bodies matter in literacy coaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30(3), 237–240. doi:10.1080/10573569.2014.908685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watulak, S. L., & Kinzer, C. K. (2012). Beyond technology skills: Toward a framework for critical digital literacies in pre-service technology education. In J. Ávila, & J. Z. Pandya (Eds.), Critical digital literacies as social praxis: Intersections and challenges (pp. 127–153). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilber, D. (2012). Trying to get ahead of the curve: Raising and understanding current themes in new literacies practices. The Educational Forum, 76(4), 406–411. doi:10.1080/00131725.2012.709415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Charles K. Kinzer

  2. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

    Donald J. Leu

Authors
  1. Charles K. Kinzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donald J. Leu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles K. Kinzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Michael A. Peters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kinzer, C.K., Leu, D.J. (2016). new literacies, New Literacies. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_111-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_111-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation