Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plagiarism, International Students, and the Second-Language Writer

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Academic Integrity

Abstract

Plagiarism is a particularly complex issue because it straddles the boundary between academic integrity and academic literacy. Academic texts are widely understood to involve complex and precise expression and rhetorical sophistication. Learning to write them is rarely easy, but writers who are working through a second language face an additional challenge. Because of a trend toward increased international mobility among students, the number of inexperienced academic writers using a second language is large and rising rapidly. If, as it has been suggested, this group is especially likely to be charged with plagiarism, then there is a real danger both to the students in this group and to standards of academic integrity. This chapter examines the aspects of plagiarism which are of particular relevance to second-language writers, identifies potential problem areas, and suggests solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, A., Follari, M., Hewett, A., Jones, S., Kemp, N., Meares, D., Pearce, D., & Van Cauter, K. (2004). Vision 2020: Forecasting international student mobility: A UK perspective. London: British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, E. (2009). Local plagiarisms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenn-White, M., & Faethe, E. (2013). English-taught master’s programs in Europe: A 2013 update. New York: Institute of International Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (1990). Writing with others’ words: Using background reading text in academic compositions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 211–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, S.-C. (2014). Cultural constructions of plagiarism in student writing: Teachers’ perceptions and responses. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 120–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 487–499). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2013). The development of source use by international postgraduate students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication. Applied Linguistics, 28, 440–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35, 305–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57, 788–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants. Stamford: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M., Serviss, T., & Rodrigue, T. K. (2010). Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing and Pedagogy, 2, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M. H., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 403–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, G., & Rose, M. (1989). Rethinking remediation: Toward a social-cognitive understanding of problematic reading and writing. Written Communication, 6, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IELTS Institutions – IELTS band scores. http://www.ielts.org/institutions/test_format_and_results/ielts_band_scores.aspx

  • Jamieson, S. (2008). One size does not fit all: Plagiarism across the curriculum. In R. M. Howard & A. E. Robillard (Eds.), Pluralizing plagiarism: Identities, contexts, pedagogies (pp. 77–91). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, S. (forthcoming). Plagiarism or patchwriting? In T. Bretag (Ed.), The handbook of academic integrity. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Casanave, C. P. (2012). Two first-year students’ strategies for writing from sources: Patchwriting or plagiarism? Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauranen, A., Ranta, E. & Hynninen, N. (2016). English as a lingua franca and EAP. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 44–55). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Y. (2002). Korean university students’ awareness of plagiarism in summary writings. Language Research, 38, 1349–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley. J. Academic Phrasebank. http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/. Accessed 21 Nov 2014.

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2000). Education at a glance 1998: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2008). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2016). Intertextuality and plagiarism. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 231–243). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D., & Petrić, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 47, 269–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D., & Shaw, P. (2012). Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., Malmström, H., & Irvine, A. (2011). English textbooks in parallel-language tertiary education. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrić, B. (2004). A pedagogical perspective on plagiarism. NovELTy, 11, 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. (1997). Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized? The Psychological Record, 47, 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. (2001). Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). “Not necessarily a bad thing …”: A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 465–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, P., & McMillion, A. (2008). Proficiency effects and compensation in advanced second-language reading. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 7, 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, L. (2006). Cultural backgrounds and textual appropriation. Language Awareness, 15, 264–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistiska Centralbyrån. (2013). Internationell studentmobilitet i högskolan 2012/13 [International mobility in higher education from a Swedish perspective 2012/13]. Stockholm: Statistiska Centralbyrån.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Languages, Linnaeus University, 35195, Växjö, Sweden

    Diane Pecorari

Authors
  1. Diane Pecorari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane Pecorari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Australia, School of Management, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Tracey Bretag

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pecorari, D. (2016). Plagiarism, International Students, and the Second-Language Writer. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_69

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation