Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Risk, Protection, Provision and Policy pp 151–177Cite as

Children’s Experiences in a Botanical Garden: Nature of Risk and the Risk of Nature

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 729 Accesses

Part of the book series: Geographies of Children and Young People ((GCYP,volume 12))

Abstract

This chapter reports subjective experiences in nature of five children aged 6–10 years collected during a 5-day camp in a botanical garden. Creative expressive visual methods and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Inductive analysis produced three themes: (1) caring, children being positioned to take care of nature and to be taken care of by nature; (2) protecting, nature needing protection from children and children needing protection from nature; and (3) the roles of gatekeepers in mediating attraction to and repulsion from nature were also highlighted. We examine these in the context of sociocultural constraints and invitations that children experience in developing these relationships. These themes are discussed using a theoretical framework that blends Vygotsky’s sociocultural development theory with Gibson’s theory of affordances. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model is used to highlight, in a layered format, complexities of influence that can impact a child’s experiencing of nature and risk. We argue that children seek out and benefit from manageable experiences with risk. This chapter reconceptualizes children’s experiences with nature as being socially and culturally mediated and situates the natural environment in a key position to affect developmental outcomes in children. This integrated understanding of how children relate with their natural environment supports a reconceptualization of development as a series of experiences where children engage in a transactional relationship with their physical and sociocultural environments. We argue that practitioners occupy a valuable position because they interact with all three: children, nature, and the sociocultural environment. We conclude by identifying the need for a greater foundation of interdisciplinary research such as this that draws from areas such as geography, psychology, and social theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adis, O. (1975). Play fighting. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, S. C., & Herman, T. (1997). Gender, power and crib geography: Transitional spaces and potential places. Gender, Place and Culture, 4(1), 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alerby, E. (2000). A way of visualizing children’s and young people’s thoughts about the environment: A study of drawings. Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almon, J. (2013). Adventure: The value of risk in children’s play. Annapolis: Alliance for Childhood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., Adey, P., & Bevan, P. (2010). Positioning place: Polylogic approaches to research methodology. Qualitative Research, 10(5), 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, N. (2009). Childhood and the politics of scale: Descaling children’s geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 190–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F. (2002). Where do I belong? Narrating collective identity and translocation positionality. Ethnicities, 2(4), 491–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backet-Milburn, K., & Harden, J. (2004). How children and their families construct and negotiate risk, safety and danger. Childhood, 11(4), 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bærentsen K.B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. In NordiCHI’02: Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 51–60). Aarhus: ACM Press, 19–23 Oct 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., & Smith, F. (2001). Power, positionality and practicality: Carrying out fieldwork with children. Ethics, Place & Environment: A Journal of Philosophy and Geography, 4(2), 142–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., & Weller, S. (2003). Geography of methodological issues in research with children. Qualitative Research, 3(2), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barraza, L. (1999). Children’s drawings about the environment. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bixler, R. D., & Floyd, M. F. (1997). Nature is scary, disgusting and uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bixler, R. D., Carlisle, C. L., Hammitt, W. F., & Floyd, M. F. (1994). Observed fears and discomforts among urban students on school field trips to wildland areas. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(1), 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1643–1647). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brussoni, M., Olsen, L. L., Pike, I., & Sleet, D. A. (2012). Risky play and children’s safety: Balancing priorities for optimal child development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(9), 3134–3148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachelin, A., Paisley, K., & Blanchard, A. (2009). Using significant life experience research to inform program evaluation: A case study of the nature conservancy’s wings and water wetlands education program. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree, N. (2001). Socializing nature: Theory, practice, and politics. In N. Castree & B. Braun (Eds.), Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics (pp. 1–21). Massachusetts: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences, revisited: A review of the research. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (2006). Learning to love the natural world enough to protect it. Barn nr, 2, 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 144–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C., & Uzzell, D. (2006). The socio-environmental affordances of adolescents’ environments. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments (pp. 176–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Horm-Wingerd, D. (1993). Children and the environment: Ecological awareness among preschool children. Environment and Behavior, 25(1), 103–120.S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5(4), 467–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derr, V. (2002). Children’s sense of place in Northern New Mexico. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeritt, D. (2001). Being constructive about nature. In N. Castree & Braun, B. (Eds.), Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics (pp. 22–40). Massachusetts: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dovey, K. (1990). Refuge and imagination: Places of peace in childhood. Children’s Environmental Quarterly, 7(4), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, K. (1992). Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using ourselves in research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, A., Place, G., & Sibthorp, J. (2005) Early-life outdoor experiences and an individuals environmental attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 27(3), 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J. (2000). Where is the information for affordances? Ecological Psychology, 12(1), 53–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. (2007). No fear: Growing up in a risk averse society. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, J. M. M. (2007). The affordances for social psychology of the ecological approach to social knowing. Theory & Psychology, 17(2), 265–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, C. (2003). Outdoor play- the case of risks and challenges in children’s learning and development. Safekids News, 21, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, T., & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology, 59(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, S., & Hill, M. (2005). Researching children’s experience: methods and methodological issues. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experience: Approaches and methods (pp. 1–21). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitz, R. (2000). Affective approaches to environmental education: Going beyond the imagined worlds of childhood? Ethics, Place and Environment, 3(3), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2000). Children’s geographies and the new social studies of childhood. In S. L. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies. Playing, living, learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, J. J., & Bixler, B. D. (2008). Children’s role in meaning making through their participation in an environmental education program. Journal of Environmental Education, 39(4), 44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kals, E., & Ittner, H. (2003). Children’s environmental identity: Indicators and behavioral impacts. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment (pp. 135–158). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive and evaluative development in children. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–151). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkby, M. (1989). Nature as refuge in children’s environments. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 6, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpela, K., Kytta, M., & Hartig, T. (2002). Restorative experience, self-regulation, and children’s place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 387–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, G., & Chick, G. (2007). The social construction of a sense of place. Leisure Sciences, 29(3), 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kytta, M. (2003). Children in outdoor contexts: Affordances and independent mobility in the assessment of environmental child friendliness. Unpublished Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kytta, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria of a child-friendly environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kytta, M. (2006). Environmental child-friendliness in the light of the Bullerby model. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments (pp. 141–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. H. (1999). The cognition of playground safety and children’s play: A comparison of traditional, contemporary, and naturalized playground types. In M. L. Christiansen (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference of playground safety. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, S., & Russell, W. (2008). Play for a change. Play policy and practice: A review of contemporary perspectives. London: Play England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leudar, I. (1991). Sociogenesis, coordination and mutualism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 21, 197–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linzmayer, C. D., & Halpenny, E. A. (2013). “It was Fun”: An evaluation of sand tray pictures, an innovative visually expressive method for researching children’s experiences with nature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 310–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linzmayer, C. D., & Halpenny, E. A. (2014b). “I Might Know When I’m an Adult”: Making sense of children’s relationships with nature. Children’s Geographies 12(4), 412–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linzmayer, C. D., Halpenny, E. A., & Walker, G. J. (2014). A multidimensional investigation into children’s optimal experiences with nature. Landscape Research, 39(5), 481–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, H. (2010). Relationship between parents’ beliefs and their responses to children’s risk-taking behaviour during outdoor play. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, K. A. (1991). Social affordances and interaction II: Autism and the affordances of the human environment. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, F. A., & Tetreault, M. K. (1993). Frames of positionality: Constructing meaningful dialogues about gender and race. Anthropological Quarterly, 66(3), 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H., & Limb, M. (1999). Defining an agenda for the geography of children: Review and prospect. Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), 61–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, C., & Bingley, A. (2007). Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Health and Place, 13, 799–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, K. (2002). Loving nature: Towards an ecology of emotion. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. M. (2006). Child centered? Thinking critically about children’s drawings as a visual research method. Visual Anthropology Review, 22(1), 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C. (1986). The power of nature: Orientations of girls and boys toward biotic and abiotic play settings on a reconstructed school yard. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 3(3), 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning and memory. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in quantitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollio, H. R., & Heaps, C. (2004). Themes in the human experience of nature. Psychological Reports, 94, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, K. (2004). Places for children – Children’s places. Childhood, 11(2), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risotto, A., & Giuliani, M. V. (2006). Learning neighbourhood environments: The loss of experience in a modern world. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments (pp. 75–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, J., & Aspinall, P. (2011). The emotional affordances of forest settings: An investigation in boys with extreme behavioural problems. Landscape Research, 36, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandseter, E. B. H. (2007). Categorising risky play – How can we identify risk-taking in Children’s play? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009a). Characteristics of risky play. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 20(9), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009b). Affordances of risky play in preschool: The importance of features in the play environment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandseter, E. B. H. (2014). Early childhood education and care practitioners’ perceptions of children’s risky play; examining the influence of personality and gender. Early Childhood Development and Care, 184(3), 434–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneekloth, L. H. (1989). Play environments for visually impaired children. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 83(4), 196–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebba, R. (1991). The landscapes of childhood: The reflection of childhood’s environment in adult memories and in children’s attitudes. Environment and Behaviour, 23(4), 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F., & Barker, J. (2001). Commodifying the countryside: The impact of out-of-school care on rural landscapes of children’s play. Area, 33(2), 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (1993). Children’s special places. Tucson: Zephyr Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia. Massachusetts: Orion Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R. A. (1990). Media discourse and the social construction of risk. Social Problems, 37(1), 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, A. (2003). Physical risk-taking: Dangerous or endangered? Early Years, 23(1), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton-Smith, B. (2003). Play as a parody of emotional vulnerability. In J. L. Roopnarine (Ed.), Play and educational theory and practice, play and culture studies (Vol. 5). Connecticut: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapsell, S., Tunstall, S., House, M., Whomsley, J., & Macnaghten, P. (2001). Growing up with rivers? Rivers in London children’s worlds. Area, 33(2), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. L., & Philo, C. (2004). Playful spaces? A social geography of children’s play in Livingston, Scotland. Children’s Geographies, 2(1), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovey, H. (2007). Playing outdoors: Spaces and places, risk and challenge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenti, S. S., & Gold, J. M. M. (1991). Social affordances and interaction I: Introduction. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, S. J. (2008). ‘In the Best Interests of the Child’: Juggling the geography of children’s gardens (Between adult agendas and children’s needs). Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 423–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. J. (1994). Nobody planted it, it just grew! Young adolescents’ perceptions and experiences of nature in the context of urban environmental education. Children’s Environments, 11(3), 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyndham, F. S. (2010). Environments of learning: Rarámri Children’s plant knowledge and experience of schooling, family and landscapes in the Sierra Tarahumara, Mexico. Human Ecology, 38, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyver, S., Bundy, A., Naughton, G., Tranter, P., Ragen, J., & Hansen, E. B. H. (2010, November/December). Safe outdoor play for young children: Paradoxes and consequences. Australian Association for Research in Education Conference. University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 2-130G University Hall, Van Vliet Complex, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H9, Canada

    Cara Linzmayer & Elizabeth Halpenny

Authors
  1. Cara Linzmayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Halpenny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cara Linzmayer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    Claire Freeman

  2. School of Physical, Environmental and Ma, University of New South Wales Canberra, Canberra BC, Australia

    Paul Tranter

  3. Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    Tracey Skelton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Linzmayer, C., Halpenny, E. (2017). Children’s Experiences in a Botanical Garden: Nature of Risk and the Risk of Nature. In: Freeman, C., Tranter, P., Skelton, T. (eds) Risk, Protection, Provision and Policy. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-035-3_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation